Developer ยท Junior / Minor ยท Rare Earth ยท Brazil ยท South Africa
Last updated 21 June 2026
Data compiled from public filings โ information only, not investment advice. AI‑assisted; see methodology.
Development ยท 1 project
Phalaborwa
Asset ยท Feasibility ยท Ownership 85%
Project information
As at 30 June 2025
Description
As at 30 June 2025
Flagship near-term rare-earth development project in Limpopo, South Africa, recovering the four magnet rare earths (Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb) from phosphogypsum stacks left by historic phosphoric-acid production that ceased in 2014, near Kruger National Park. The at-surface material eliminates mining, crushing and milling costs and de-risks the legacy environmental footprint. A unique flowsheet leaches the rare earths and upgrades them to a high-grade mixed rare-earth product (MREP/MREC) ahead of separation into NdPr oxide and a SEG+ (heavy REE) product; separation route (CIC vs SX) and a possible staged build are under trade-off study. An Interim Study indicates a post-tax NPV10 of US$610.9 million, post-tax IRR of 38%, ~2-year payback and operating cost of US$12.91/kg TREO over a ~16-year life producing ~1,820 tpa separated NdPr REO and ~80 tpa Dy/Tb. Rainbow owns 85%, with an option to acquire the remaining 15% from Bosveld Phosphates via issuance of 38,873,663 shares, exercisable to 30 June 2026. DFS expected 2026.
Mining metrics
As at 30 June 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources โ detail
As at 30 June 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Royalties & streams
All royalty and stream interests in the database that refer to this asset by name.
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Exploration ยท 1 project
Uberaba
Asset ยท Exploration
Project information
Description
Early-stage opportunity to replicate the Phalaborwa secondary-source model at larger scale on phosphogypsum stacks at Mosaic's phosphoric-acid production site in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Pursued under a Memorandum of Understanding with The Mosaic Company, with Rainbow and Mosaic having commenced an Economic Assessment (costs shared 50:50). Sample grades range 0.45%โ0.79% TREO with an average of 0.52% TREO โ some 32% higher than Phalaborwa โ though the material has not yet been formally defined as a JORC-compliant rare-earth resource.
Mining metrics
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Suspended ยท 1 project
Gakara
Asset ยท Suspended ยท Ownership 90%
Project information
Description
High-grade vein-hosted rare-earth project in Burundi, held through subsidiary Rainbow Mining Burundi with a non-controlling interest held by the Government of Burundi. The project remained on care and maintenance throughout the year at the request of the Government of Burundi; the RMB bank account remains suspended by the government and ongoing care-and-maintenance costs of about US$0.1 million were incurred. No current mineral resource is reported in the period.
Mining metrics
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Assumptions
- The projects listed here reflect the information captured in this workspace and are not necessarily a complete picture of the company's portfolio. For authoritative figures, refer to the company's official filings.
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
How to read this tab
- The tables below list unit codes most often used in the Rare Earths & Critical Minerals sector for this company. MetalPilot stores contained metal or product in the codes below; grade and tonnage use separate fields. In side-by-side comparison views (stock page Portfolio tab, watchlist By sector), heterogeneous source units are converted to each commodity's preferred display unit (for example Moz Au, kt Cu, MMbbl oil) before summing; the same canonical codes appear in project data.
What the Portfolio tab shows
- The Portfolio tab presents a project-level view of the company's reported assets, built from publicly disclosed information (technical reports, annual filings, MD&A, investor presentations, MRMR / R&R statements, NI 43-101 / NI 51-101 / SEC S-K 1300 / SEC S-K 1200 / JORC / SAMREC / PERC / PRMS / COGEH filings, and similar primary sources).
- Figures are grouped by project type (mining, oil & gas, royalty, stream, processing facility, development, portfolio aggregate) and are shown alongside the headline reserve base, headline production, headline grade / quality, cost benchmarks, estimated lifetime, commercial terms (for royalties / streams), operational capacity (for processing) and a single-figure rating where the underlying data supports one.
- Each data table on the Portfolio tab is followed by ONE Assumptions footnote describing the modelling choices for that table; KPI stat-card assumptions appear in the bottom block instead. All legal and section disclaimers are merged into a single disclaimer list at the bottom of the Portfolio tab.
Concepts in your sector โ Rare earths & critical minerals
- TREO vs individual oxides. Deposits disclose TREO % with a basket (Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb, โฆ). Value is dominated by magnet metals; TREO without the basket misses most of the economics.
- Vanadium in VโOโ . Reserves use % VโOโ or ppm; multiply VโOโ by 0.560 for V metal.
- Niobium, tantalum, scandium, fluorspar each have their own chemistry idiom; the rating engine normalises within commodity family.
Portfolio tab โ table guide
- Portfolio KPIs โ company-level headline numbers aggregated from the featured projects (project counts, attributable annual production by commodity, attributable resource base by commodity, last filing date, operator share). USD value lines multiply attributable volumes by the resolved snapshot price.
- Portfolio snapshot โ one-screen summary of the portfolio: counts by type and status, country mix, reporting standards used, operator share, primary commodity, attributable annual production summary and attributable resource base summary.
- Mining โ one row per mining project, with columns for project name, location, status, primary commodities, production (with rating), reserves & resources (with rating), grade (with rating), costs and estimated lifetime. Multi-commodity projects emit one summary row per commodity.
- Royalty โ one row per royalty interest held by the company. Columns cover the underlying project, operator, commodity, commercial terms (rate, type, cap, area-of-interest), attributable production, attributable reserves and estimated lifetime.
- Stream โ one row per metal stream held by the company. Each row shows the underlying project, the streamed commodity, the headline stream percentage, the ongoing per-ounce / per-tonne payment, and attributable production / reserves.
- Processing facilities โ one row per midstream / processing facility (pipeline, fractionator, LNG train, storage cavern, refinery, smelter, mill, heap-leach pad, CPP, etc.). Columns include nameplate capacity, contracted capacity, feedstock commodities and operational footprint.
- Development โ projects in development status or in a pre-production lifecycle phase. The production column is re-labelled 'Targeted production (rating)' to highlight that the figures are plans, not actuals.
- Portfolio Aggregate โ a single company-level row used when the company itself publishes a portfolio rollup (e.g. company-wide 2P barrels across all properties).
- Reserves & resources โ detail โ a leaf-category pivot showing every reserve and resource category disclosed across the projects.
- NPV (grouped) โ all NPV rows captured from the filings, grouped by commodity, resource category, development status and pricing case. Each NPV figure is shown with its discount rate, basis (before-tax / after-tax), currency and value scale.
Ownership / Working interest
- Ownership percentage means the company's working-interest share of the asset: its slice of the project before royalties and before government take. It is shown on a 0โ100 scale.
- Mines, oil and gas fields, and processing facilities โ this is how much of the asset belongs to the company under that working-interest idea. One hundred percent is fully owned; a lower number usually means partners share the rest.
- Royalties and streaming agreements โ the percentage is often not the story; what matters economically is usually the royalty or stream rate, shown elsewhere alongside these figures.
- Oil and gas โ read this as gross working interest only. Do not treat it as net production or net wells after royalties; when filings distinguish gross from net, that shows up in how the resource numbers themselves are labelled.
- Below 100% โ the short summary for each project names other owners and their stakes when the source says who they are.
- NRI vs WI (O&G). Working interest (WI) is the obligation to pay a share of costs; net revenue interest (NRI) is the share of revenue after royalties and overriding-royalty interests. A 100% WI well rarely produces 100% NRI; typical onshore U.S. NRI is 75โ87.5% of WI depending on the lease royalty.
- Operator vs non-operator. The operator runs day-to-day operations; non-operating partners pay their WI share of costs but do not run the asset. Some Portfolio rows show operator share where disclosed.
Unit codes, conversion cheat sheets, cost benchmarks (AISC, C1โC3), reporting standards (NI 43-101, JORC, SEC S-K 1300) and resource/reserve category definitions live in the full terminology & units reference.
Copyright ยฉ 2026, Metal Pilot
We use strictly necessary cookies for authentication and site functionality. Optional analytics (Google Analytics) load only after you accept; we do not use advertising, remarketing, or Google Signals. We honour Global Privacy Control (GPC) and other recognised opt-out signals by keeping analytics off for that browser.