Copper Canada South America Chile Senior Producer
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE): TECK Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX): TECK.A Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX): TECK.B

Teck Resources Ltd.

$15.8B
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Teck Resources Ltd. is a senior copper producer headquartered in Vancouver, Canada, operating primarily in Canada and South America. The company's portfolio consists of 11 projects, comprising 5 operating mines and 6 development projects. Key assets include Antamina, Quebrada Blanca, Red Dog, and Highland Valley. The company's business model is centered on an integrated value chain encompassing exploration, development, mining, minerals processing, smelting, and refining. This structure is complemented by in-house expertise in commodity sales, trading, and supply chain management. The organization is structured into regional business units and a dedicated projects group, a framework designed to streamline executive leadership and drive efficient operational performance. This model facilitates the responsible development of growth opportunities and aims to maximize value for shareholders. A core component of the business involves the production of various specialty metals, chemicals, and fertilizers as by-products of its primary operations. The enterprise also maintains a focus on research and recycling, leveraging its technical capabilities to support materials stewardship. This integrated approach, from resource discovery to final product sales, allows for significant operational control and the ability to capture value across the entire production lifecycle, positioning the entity to provide essential resources for global development.

Strategy

Strategic direction is built upon 4 key pillars: core excellence, providing metals for the energy transition, value-driven growth, and resilience. The approach seeks to maximize productivity and efficiency at existing operations while maintaining a strong balance sheet and delivering commercial excellence. A core tenet is the disciplined advancement of a growth pipeline, with projects progressing through feasibility studies, detailed engineering, and permitting to de-risk investments prior to sanctioning. The capital allocation framework balances shareholder returns with strategic growth, supplementing a base dividend with additional returns from available cash flow after accounting for sustaining capital, committed growth projects, and balance sheet adjustments. This framework also provides for share repurchases and supplemental dividends, contingent on market conditions. The organization's long-term objective is to significantly grow its production of materials critical to the energy transition by the end of the decade, supported by a strong financial position to fund value-accretive projects.

Management

Governance is overseen by a Board of Directors that welcomed 2 new members in 2024. The Board's oversight is structured through specialized committees, including an Audit Committee composed entirely of independent directors. Executive leadership is focused on driving value-accretive growth while maintaining a rigorous focus on operational excellence and safety. The management philosophy is demonstrated through initiatives such as the 'Courageous Safety Leadership' program, which empowers employees to take ownership of safety, and a mental health first aid training program that has been completed by over 80% of frontline supervisors. The corporate structure was streamlined to feature a focused executive leadership team and a regional framework to enhance operational effectiveness and capitalize on growth opportunities. Management's report on internal control over financial reporting, based on the COSO 2013 framework, concluded that controls were effective as of year-end 2024, with the independent auditor expressing the same opinion.

Sustainability

The sustainability strategy includes a long-term goal to achieve net-zero Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, a short-term goal for net-zero Scope 2 emissions by 2025, and an ambition for net-zero Scope 3 emissions by 2050. In 2024, the company released its first integrated Climate Change and Nature Report, combining the recommendations of the TNFD and TCFD. All operating sites have achieved certification under responsible production mark programs, with one site being the first to receive a stand-alone Zinc Mark. Workplace safety performance is a key priority, reflected in a continued low High-Potential Incident Frequency rate of 0.12 in 2024. The organization's performance has been recognized externally, having been named to the Dow Jones Best-in-Class World Index for the 15th consecutive year and as one of the Best 50 Corporate Citizens in its home country for the 18th consecutive year. It was also named to the Forbes list of the World’s Top Companies for Women 2024.

Structure

The corporate structure underwent significant transformation in 2024 with the completed sale of its entire steelmaking coal business, Elk Valley Resources, to Glencore, Nippon Steel Corporation, and POSCO. This followed the 2023 divestiture of its 21.3% interest in the Fort Hills assets to Suncor and TEPCA. In 2023, the company formed a 50:50 joint arrangement with Agnico Eagle to advance the San Nicolás project, with the partner contributing capital for study and development costs. A separate 50:50 joint arrangement, NewRange Copper Nickel LLC, was formed with PolyMet Mining Corp. in 2023 to advance the NorthMet project and the Mesaba mineral deposit. Significant operating subsidiaries include Teck Metals Ltd., Teck Alaska Incorporated, Teck Highland Valley Copper Partnership, Compañía Minera Teck Quebrada Blanca S.A. (QBSA), and Compañía Minera Teck Carmen de Andacollo. Key ownership arrangements include a partnership in QBSA with Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Corporation, and Codelco, as well as a 22.5% interest in the Antamina joint operation alongside partners BHP, Glencore, and Mitsubishi Corporation.

Source

Teck - 2024 Annual Report

Antamina
22.50%
🇵🇪 Ancash, Peru
operating, open pit
Annual production: 500 - 1000 Mlb Cu (high)
Resource base: > 20000 Mlb Cu (very high)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: > 12 moz ag (very high)
Resource base: > 225 moz ag (very high)
Average Grade < 50 g/t ag (very low)
Quebrada Blanca
60.00%
🇨🇱 Tarapacá, Chile
operating, open pit
Annual production: 500 - 1000 Mlb Cu (high)
Resource base: > 20000 Mlb Cu (very high)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: 5 - 15 Mlbs Mo (low)
Resource base: > 1000 Mlbs Mo (very high)
Average Grade 0.03 - 0.06 % Mo (low)
Red Dog
100.00%
🇺🇸 Alaska, USA
operating, open pit
Annual production: 300 - 500 kt Zn (high)
Resource base: > 15 Mt Zn (very high)
Average Grade > 12 % Zn (very high)
Annual production: 3 - 7 moz ag (medium)
Resource base: 150 - 225 moz ag (high)
Average Grade 50 - 100 g/t ag (low)
Highland Valley
100.00%
🇨🇦 British Columbia, Canada
operating, open pit
Annual production: 250 - 500 Mlb Cu (medium)
Resource base: 4000 - 10000 Mlb Cu (medium)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: < 5 Mlbs Mo (very low)
Resource base: 50 - 200 Mlbs Mo (low)
Average Grade 0.03 - 0.06 % Mo (low)
Carmen De Andacollo
90.00%
🇨🇱 Coquimbo, Chile
operating, open pit
Annual production: < 100 Mlb Cu (very low)
Resource base: 1000 - 4000 Mlb Cu (low)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: < 50 koz au (very low)
Resource base: 1 - 2.5 moz au (low)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Newrange
50.00%
🇺🇸 Minnesota, USA
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 20000 Mlb Cu (very high)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 1500 kt Ni (very high)
Average Grade 0.6 - 1.2 % Ni (low)
Nuevaunión
50.00%
🇨🇱 Atacama, Chile
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 20000 Mlb Cu (very high)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 10 moz au (very high)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Galore Creek
50.00%
🇨🇦 British Columbia, Canada
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 10000 - 20000 Mlb Cu (high)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Schaft Creek
75.00%
🇨🇦 British Columbia, Canada
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 4000 - 10000 Mlb Cu (medium)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
San Nicolás
50.00%
🇲🇽 Zacatecas, México
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 1000 - 4000 Mlb Cu (low)
Average Grade 1 - 1.5 % (medium)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 1 - 2.5 moz au (low)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Zafranal
80.00%
🇵🇪 Arequipa, Peru
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 1000 - 4000 Mlb Cu (low)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 1 - 2.5 moz au (low)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©