Lithium USA Junior Explorer
TSX Venture Exchange (TSXV): NILI OTCQX (OTC): NILIF

Surge Battery Metals Inc.

$31.7M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Surge Battery Metals Inc. is a junior lithium exploration company headquartered in West Vancouver, Canada, operating primarily in USA. The company's portfolio consists of 1 development project. Key assets include Nevada North. The company operates as an exploration-stage enterprise focused on the acquisition and development of mineral properties. Its business model centers on advancing projects through systematic exploration programs, including extensive soil sampling, reverse circulation, sonic, and diamond drilling campaigns. A key operational characteristic is the engagement of specialized third-party consultants for critical technical milestones, such as the calculation of mineral resource estimates and the execution of preliminary extractive metallurgical studies. This approach allows the organization to leverage external expertise to validate project potential and de-risk development. The entity's performance and positioning within its peer group were recognized through its ranking as a top 50 mining company on the TSX Venture Exchange in February 2024, a distinction based on share price appreciation, trading volume, and market capitalization growth. The operational focus remains on advancing its core assets by systematically proving out geology and processing viability before committing to larger-scale development.

Strategy

Strategic priorities are centered on advancing the company's primary exploration asset toward economic viability through a multi-faceted, data-driven approach. A core objective is the systematic expansion and delineation of the known mineral resource, supported by the recent approval of an expanded exploration permit that allows for more extensive drilling activities. Management's approach involves concurrently advancing technical studies to de-risk the project, including commissioning a Preliminary Economic Assessment with M3 Engineering and Technology Company to evaluate potential project economics. To support this, the company is conducting metallurgical test work with Kemetco to confirm the viability of producing a high-purity end-product. Capital allocation is focused on funding these critical-path activities, as evidenced by a non-brokered private placement completed subsequent to the fiscal year-end. The strategy also includes portfolio optimization, demonstrated by the divestiture of a non-core asset to concentrate resources on its principal project.

Management

Executive leadership is structured through independent contractor agreements with key personnel, including the Chairman and the President/CEO. These agreements feature significant one-year and two-year payout provisions for termination without cause or a change of control, respectively, indicating a management philosophy geared towards retaining core leadership and ensuring stability. The governance framework is shaped by its status as a venture issuer, which involves specific disclosure practices and internal control considerations. The CEO and CFO are responsible for designing internal controls over financial reporting, and the company acknowledges that weaknesses, such as a lack of segregation of duties, are present due to its size. This risk is mitigated through direct and extensive monitoring by senior management. The company also leverages the expertise of related parties and external consultants for specialized management and exploration services, including a consulting agreement with a company related by a common director to assist with exploration.

Sustainability

The company's approach to sustainability is demonstrated through proactive environmental assessment and direct stakeholder engagement. A key initiative involves conducting comprehensive environmental and hydrological studies to support a formal Environmental Assessment, a critical step for securing regulatory approval for an expanded exploration plan of operations. This reflects a commitment to understanding and managing the potential environmental footprint of its activities in advance of significant ground disturbance. Social responsibility and community relations are addressed through direct negotiations and formal agreements with local landholders. In March 2024, the organization successfully concluded an agreement with a local cattlemen's association, securing permission for drilling and surface use on private grounds, thereby aligning its exploration objectives with the interests of local stakeholders and ensuring continued access for its programs.

Structure

The corporate structure has been actively shaped by strategic transactions aimed at consolidating core assets and divesting non-core holdings. In October 2024, the company completed the sale of its 100% interest in the Nickel Project to FPX Nickel Corp., a move designed to streamline its portfolio. To consolidate its primary project, the company entered into an agreement in August 2024 to acquire the remaining 50% interest in the M3M Claims from M3 Metals Corp., which superseded a prior joint venture option agreement. The entity also expanded its footprint by purchasing a 25% interest in the mineral rights on adjacent private lands through separate agreements with the Wilkins Family and Y3-II in 2023. This led to a technical and financial partnership with Evolution Gold, which holds the remaining 75% interest, for exploration drilling on those specific parcels. A consulting agreement was also established with American Lithium Corp., a related party, to provide exploration assistance.

Source

Surge Battery Metals Inc. - Management’s Discussion And Analysis - 2024

Nevada North
100.00%
🇺🇸 Nevada, USA
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 5000 kt LCE (very high)
Average Grade very low (very low)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©