Producer · Mid-Tier · Silver · China · South America
Last updated 21 June 2026
Data compiled from public filings — information only, not investment advice. AI‑assisted; see methodology.
Portfolio Aggregate · 1 project
Portfolio mode — asset rows are for context only; tab totals use the company aggregation.
Silvercorp Consolidated Portfolio
Portfolio
Project information
As at 31 March 2025
Description
As at 31 March 2025
Consolidated production and guidance for Silvercorp Metals Inc. across all operating mines (Ying Mining District in Henan Province, GC/Gaocheng Mine in Guangdong Province). Fiscal 2025 (year ended March 31, 2025): processed 1,312,695 tonnes of ore producing 7,495 oz Au, 6.948 Moz Ag, 62.170 Mlb Pb and 23.317 Mlb Zn. Total revenue of $298.9M (up 39% YoY), net income $58.2M ($0.29/share), cash flow from operations $138.6M. Plus development-stage El Domo (75%-owned via Adventus acquisition closed July 31, 2024) and exploration-stage Condor (98.7%) in Ecuador plus Kuanping in China.
Portfolio Aggregate
Multiple effective dates
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Operating · 2 projects
GC Mine (Gaocheng)
Asset · Ownership 99%
Project information
As at 30 June 2024
Description
As at 30 June 2024
99%-owned underground silver-lead-zinc mine in Gaocun Township, Yun'an District, Yunfu City, Guangdong Province, China. Commercially operating since Q2 2014. Polymetallic mesothermal vein-infill style of deposit. UG mining via mobile rubber-tired equipment (Stage 1) and tracked equipment + shaft (Stage 2) down to -300 mRL; Stage 3 design extends mining from -300 to -500 mRL. Mining methods: traditional shrinkage, resuing, and overhand cut-and-fill. Processing plant 1,600 tpd nameplate (~900-950 tpd per parallel circuit). 2024 LOM schedule ramps annual ore production from ~313 to 363 kt by FY2026, ~5.0 Mt LOM. Plus dry-stack TSF; intelligent pre-sorting system replaced manual hand-sorting in 2023.
Mining metrics
Multiple effective dates · inclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 30 June 2024
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Ying Mining District
District · Ownership 77.5%
Project information
As at 30 June 2024
Description
As at 30 June 2024
Underground silver-lead-zinc mining district in Henan Province, China. Comprises seven mines: SGX (flagship), HZG (~5 km south of SGX), TLP (11 km southeast of SGX), HPG (silver-gold-lead-zinc, northeast of SGX), LME (~12 km southeast of SGX), LMW (~2.4 km west of LME), and DCG. Silvercorp holds ~77.5% direct interest plus 80% beneficial interest in HPG/LME via Henan Mineral Resources Group. Yuelianggou Mining License (SGX, HZG) renewed Oct 8, 2024 for 11 more years to Sep 24, 2035 with capacity increase to 500,000 tpa. New production line expanding Ying total milling capacity to >1.3 Mtpa to accommodate Kuanping mine. November 2022 Technical Report by AMC Mining Consultants; projects ~89 Moz Ag over 14-year LOM. Reserves at $1,800/oz Au, $21/oz Ag, $1.00/lb Pb, $1.10/lb Zn; exchange 7.00 RMB/USD.
Mining metrics
Multiple effective dates · inclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 30 June 2024
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Construction · 1 project
El Domo Project
Asset · Construction · Ownership 75%
Project information
As at 30 June 2024
Description
As at 30 June 2024
Silvercorp 75%-owned (via Adventus / Curimining; 25% Salazar Resources) Cu-Au-Ag-Zn-Pb VMS development project in central Ecuador's Bolívar Province, ~150 km northeast of Guayaquil (~3-hour drive). Project area 172 ha + 118 ha buffer (2.9 km² total). 2021 Feasibility Study completed by Adventus. Acquired via Adventus Acquisition (July 31, 2024); ~C$200M equity. Construction plan and schedule announced April 23, 2025. Wheaton PMPA gold pre-purchase agreement: $13.25M advanced as at Sept 30, 2024; repaid in November 2024. Bolivar Provincial Court dismissed constitutional appeal Nov 11, 2024, affirming Curimining's rights to continue construction.
Mining metrics
As at 31 March 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Exploration · 2 projects
Kuanping
Asset · Pre-feasibility · Ownership 77.5%
Project information
As at 30 June 2024
Description
As at 30 June 2024
Silver-lead-zinc exploration property in the Ying Mining District, Henan Province, China. Located near the Ying complex; future production planned to feed into Ying's expanded milling capacity of >1.3 Mtpa (new production line).
Mining metrics
As at 31 March 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Condor Project
District · Pre-feasibility · Ownership 98.7%
Project information
As at 28 February 2025
Description
As at 28 February 2025
98.7%-owned (via Adventus / Luminex) gold-silver-zinc exploration project in Zamora-Chinchipe Province, Ecuador. Comprises Camp and Los Cuyes deposits. Updated independent NI 43-101 Mineral Resource Estimate (Condor MRE) by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. with effective date Feb 28, 2025, prepared by QP Mark Wanless. Focused on higher-grade underground material. Cut-off 2.2 g/t AuEq. Initial metallurgical tests indicate Au recoveries up to 96% (Camp) and 88% (Los Cuyes) via cyanide leaching. Not considered a material property — MRE filed on a voluntary basis.
Mining metrics
As at 28 February 2025 · exclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 28 February 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Assumptions
- The projects listed here reflect the information captured in this workspace and are not necessarily a complete picture of the company's portfolio. For authoritative figures, refer to the company's official filings.
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
How to read this tab
- The tables below list unit codes most often used in the Precious Metals sector for this company. MetalPilot stores contained metal or product in the codes below; grade and tonnage use separate fields. In side-by-side comparison views (stock page Portfolio tab, watchlist By sector), heterogeneous source units are converted to each commodity's preferred display unit (for example Moz Au, kt Cu, MMbbl oil) before summing; the same canonical codes appear in project data.
What the Portfolio tab shows
- The Portfolio tab presents a project-level view of the company's reported assets, built from publicly disclosed information (technical reports, annual filings, MD&A, investor presentations, MRMR / R&R statements, NI 43-101 / NI 51-101 / SEC S-K 1300 / SEC S-K 1200 / JORC / SAMREC / PERC / PRMS / COGEH filings, and similar primary sources).
- Figures are grouped by project type (mining, oil & gas, royalty, stream, processing facility, development, portfolio aggregate) and are shown alongside the headline reserve base, headline production, headline grade / quality, cost benchmarks, estimated lifetime, commercial terms (for royalties / streams), operational capacity (for processing) and a single-figure rating where the underlying data supports one.
- Each data table on the Portfolio tab is followed by ONE Assumptions footnote describing the modelling choices for that table; KPI stat-card assumptions appear in the bottom block instead. All legal and section disclaimers are merged into a single disclaimer list at the bottom of the Portfolio tab.
Concepts in your sector — Precious metals
- Resources vs Reserves. Resources are geological estimates that could one day be mined; Reserves are the subset with a feasibility study and plausible positive economics. Measured → Indicated → Inferred describe increasing geological uncertainty; Proven → Probable are reserve labels from Measured/Indicated. Inferred resources are not convertible to reserves under most codes.
- Grade (g/t) is the headline number on gold/silver pages. High-grade is often above 5 g/t; >10 g/t is bonanza territory; below 1 g/t is bulk low-grade. Open-pit cut-offs are typically lower than underground.
- AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost) is direct cash costs + sustaining capex + royalties + corporate overhead + reclamation, per ounce produced. C1 strips sustaining capex and corporate overhead. Both are non-GAAP and defined differently across issuers.
- By-product credits. Polymetallic deposits credit by-product value against the main metal cost; negative AISC after credits does not mean the main metal is sold below cash cost.
Portfolio tab — table guide
- Portfolio KPIs — company-level headline numbers aggregated from the featured projects (project counts, attributable annual production by commodity, attributable resource base by commodity, last filing date, operator share). USD value lines multiply attributable volumes by the resolved snapshot price.
- Portfolio snapshot — one-screen summary of the portfolio: counts by type and status, country mix, reporting standards used, operator share, primary commodity, attributable annual production summary and attributable resource base summary.
- Mining — one row per mining project, with columns for project name, location, status, primary commodities, production (with rating), reserves & resources (with rating), grade (with rating), costs and estimated lifetime. Multi-commodity projects emit one summary row per commodity.
- Royalty — one row per royalty interest held by the company. Columns cover the underlying project, operator, commodity, commercial terms (rate, type, cap, area-of-interest), attributable production, attributable reserves and estimated lifetime.
- Stream — one row per metal stream held by the company. Each row shows the underlying project, the streamed commodity, the headline stream percentage, the ongoing per-ounce / per-tonne payment, and attributable production / reserves.
- Processing facilities — one row per midstream / processing facility (pipeline, fractionator, LNG train, storage cavern, refinery, smelter, mill, heap-leach pad, CPP, etc.). Columns include nameplate capacity, contracted capacity, feedstock commodities and operational footprint.
- Development — projects in development status or in a pre-production lifecycle phase. The production column is re-labelled 'Targeted production (rating)' to highlight that the figures are plans, not actuals.
- Portfolio Aggregate — a single company-level row used when the company itself publishes a portfolio rollup (e.g. company-wide 2P barrels across all properties).
- Reserves & resources — detail — a leaf-category pivot showing every reserve and resource category disclosed across the projects.
- NPV (grouped) — all NPV rows captured from the filings, grouped by commodity, resource category, development status and pricing case. Each NPV figure is shown with its discount rate, basis (before-tax / after-tax), currency and value scale.
Ownership / Working interest
- Ownership percentage means the company's working-interest share of the asset: its slice of the project before royalties and before government take. It is shown on a 0–100 scale.
- Mines, oil and gas fields, and processing facilities — this is how much of the asset belongs to the company under that working-interest idea. One hundred percent is fully owned; a lower number usually means partners share the rest.
- Royalties and streaming agreements — the percentage is often not the story; what matters economically is usually the royalty or stream rate, shown elsewhere alongside these figures.
- Oil and gas — read this as gross working interest only. Do not treat it as net production or net wells after royalties; when filings distinguish gross from net, that shows up in how the resource numbers themselves are labelled.
- Below 100% — the short summary for each project names other owners and their stakes when the source says who they are.
- NRI vs WI (O&G). Working interest (WI) is the obligation to pay a share of costs; net revenue interest (NRI) is the share of revenue after royalties and overriding-royalty interests. A 100% WI well rarely produces 100% NRI; typical onshore U.S. NRI is 75–87.5% of WI depending on the lease royalty.
- Operator vs non-operator. The operator runs day-to-day operations; non-operating partners pay their WI share of costs but do not run the asset. Some Portfolio rows show operator share where disclosed.
Unit codes, conversion cheat sheets, cost benchmarks (AISC, C1–C3), reporting standards (NI 43-101, JORC, SEC S-K 1300) and resource/reserve category definitions live in the full terminology & units reference.
Each table lists the numeric band for scores 1–5 (production and resource base; grade where applicable for mining commodities) using the same thresholds as project rating stat cards. Only commodities that appear on featured projects for this document are listed.
Gold
Silver
Copper
Zinc
Lead
Copper uses kt Cu bands (Mlb Cu when lb-scale copper resources appear on featured projects). Lithium grade uses hard-rock % Li₂O bands unless brine-style extraction or brine units appear on featured projects.
Assumptions
- Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Copyright © 2026, Metal Pilot
We use strictly necessary cookies for authentication and site functionality. Optional analytics (Google Analytics) load only after you accept; we do not use advertising, remarketing, or Google Signals. We honour Global Privacy Control (GPC) and other recognised opt-out signals by keeping analytics off for that browser.