Revival Gold Inc.
Overview
Revival Gold Inc. is a junior gold development company headquartered in Toronto, Canada, operating primarily in USA. The company's portfolio consists of 3 projects, comprising 2 development and 1 advanced exploration project. Key assets include Beartrack-Arnett and Mercur. The company operates as a pure-play mineral developer focused on advancing brownfield sites toward production. Its business model centers on leveraging significant existing infrastructure from past-producing operations, a strategy intended to reduce initial capital expenditures and mitigate development risks. A key operational characteristic is the pursuit of a capital-efficient, phased production growth plan. The enterprise aims to achieve synergies through a recently expanded asset base, which allows for the sharing of management resources and the application of cross-project technical expertise in studies, permitting, and de-risking activities. This approach is designed to lower overall risk and create incremental value as the business expands. The organization currently generates no revenue from operations and is dependent on its ability to secure financing to fund its development activities and meet its corporate obligations. The competitive strategy involves creating a larger-scale development entity to enhance its market profile and accelerate its timeline to becoming a mid-tier producer.
Strategy
Strategic priorities are centered on a phased development approach designed to systematically de-risk assets and manage capital exposure. Near-term objectives involve advancing engineering and economic studies, including the completion of a Preliminary Economic Assessment and ongoing metallurgical column leach tests to refine processing parameters. The organization plans to initiate work on a draft Plan of Operations to advance permitting readiness. Resource delineation and expansion efforts are supported by focused field work, including geological mapping, surface sampling, and geophysical surveys such as gradient-induced polarization and ground magnetics to refine exploration targets. A comprehensive review of historical data is also underway to develop robust geo-metallurgical models. The long-term vision is to transition into a mid-tier producer. Capital allocation is managed dynamically, with management prepared to adjust expenditures based on exploration outcomes, working capital levels, and prevailing market conditions. The company also routinely evaluates various business development opportunities, including property options, acquisitions, and divestitures, to optimize its portfolio.
Management
Executive leadership includes experienced technical personnel designated as Qualified Persons who provide direct oversight for engineering, development, and exploration activities. The governance framework includes a board of directors with a Chairman. The company's policies require directors who serve on the boards of other entities to disclose any potential conflicts of interest and abstain from voting on related matters. As a venture issuer, the organization's certifying officers do not make formal representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting. The corporate structure relies on a few key management personnel to direct its exploration and development activities. As of June 30, 2024, directors and officers of the company collectively controlled approximately 9.0% of the total common shares outstanding, indicating a degree of alignment between management and shareholder interests. The company has also established relationships with external consulting engineering firms to support its technical assessments and studies.
Sustainability
The organization's activities are subject to a wide range of government laws and regulations concerning environmental protection, which are noted to be continually evolving and becoming more restrictive. Its environmental management approach is centered on compliance with these regulations to mitigate risks and liabilities. The company is required to obtain various permits for its exploration, closure, and reclamation activities, which necessitates adherence to stringent environmental standards and laws. To secure future clean-up obligations associated with its exploration work, the enterprise has a reclamation bond in place with a surety bond company, as required by regulatory authorities. The company's operations are also governed by regulations for the protection of historic and archaeological sites as well as endangered and protected species. Management has stated that it does not believe there are any significant environmental obligations requiring material capital outlays in the immediate future and does not maintain specific environmental liability insurance.
Structure
In 2024, the company completed a significant business combination by acquiring all issued and outstanding shares of Ensign Minerals Inc. through a statutory three-cornered amalgamation. This transaction resulted in Ensign Minerals Inc. becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary and its asset-holding entity, Ensign Gold (US) Corp, becoming an indirect subsidiary. A special-purpose entity, Revival Gold Amalgamation Corp., was incorporated to facilitate the transaction. The company holds an option to acquire a 100% interest in Meridian Beartrack, a subsidiary of Meridian Gold Company, which is wholly owned by Pan American Silver Inc. This earn-in agreement, most recently amended on August 30, 2024, involves share issuances and funding exploration and site maintenance costs, with the amendment providing a 3-year extension to the earn-in period and modifying future royalty terms. In August 2023, the organization terminated a 1% net smelter return royalty on the Hai & Gold Bug Claims through a combination of a cash payment and the issuance of 200,000 common shares. The company also holds a 51% interest in the Diamond Mountain phosphate project, the value of which has been impaired due to a change in corporate focus.
Source
Revival Gold Inc. - Management’s Discussion & Analysis - 2024
- Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
- The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
- Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
- Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
- Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
- Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
- Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
- Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
- Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
- Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
- koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
- moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
- g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
- usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
- moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
- g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
- usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
- kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
- mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
- %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
- usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
- mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
- % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
- usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
- Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
- Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
- ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
- Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
- Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
- Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
- Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
- Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
- P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
- M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
- Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
- Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
- PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
- Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
- Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
- BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
- NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
- IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
- Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
- AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
- Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
- Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
- NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
- GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
- NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery