Gold Africa Junior Producer
Australian Securities Exchange (ASX): RSG London Stock Exchange (LSE): RSG

Resolute Mining Ltd.

$996.3M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Resolute Mining Ltd. is a junior gold producer headquartered in Perth, Australia, operating primarily in Africa. The company's portfolio consists of 3 projects, comprising 2 operating mines and 1 development project. Key assets include Syama and Doropo. The business model centers on being an integrated explorer, developer, and operator with a demonstrated history of overcoming operational obstacles. The company utilizes diverse processing capabilities, including distinct sulphide and oxide circuits, and employs both large-scale sub-level cave underground mining and conventional open-pit methods. A core operational characteristic is the emphasis on achieving stability and efficiency through continuous productivity improvements, such as optimizing truck fill and loader operations. The enterprise maintains significant operational flexibility, underscored by infrastructure designed to switch between different ore types to maximize value. This adaptability allows for strategic sequencing of processing, such as prioritizing certain stockpiled materials before completing major capital projects, which serves to optimize near-term cash flows and align production with long-term asset potential. The operational approach is further defined by a focus on strict inventory management and rigorous reviews of capital projects to ensure disciplined execution.

Strategy

Strategic priorities focus on creating long-term value through a combination of organic growth and geographic diversification. A key objective is to extend the life of existing infrastructure by systematically exploring and defining resources at satellite deposits. The organization's capital allocation philosophy is demonstrated by its decision to revise the schedule for a major capital project to first process remaining oxide material, a move designed to optimize cash flow generation. The enterprise actively pursues growth and risk mitigation by expanding its exploration activities into new regions through joint venture agreements, adding a fourth country to its portfolio in 2024. Management's approach involves proactively managing geopolitical and regulatory risks, including adapting to new mining codes which are expected to increase operating costs. The strategy for 2025 involves navigating a transitional period by building on operational stability, strengthening stakeholder relationships, and continuing to invest in the productive capacity of its asset base.

Management

The board of directors consists of 7 members, including a Non-Executive Chairman and a Managing Director & CEO. Corporate governance is structured around 4 primary committees: Audit and Risk, Remuneration, Nomination, and Sustainability. The board provides oversight for a comprehensive Enterprise Risk Management framework aligned with ISO 31000:2018, with the Audit and Risk Committee mandated to oversee all material risk exposures. In 2024, the entity demonstrated a commitment to internal talent development and seamless leadership progression through the internal appointments of a new Chief Executive Officer and a new Chief Financial Officer. The governance framework proved its resilience during a significant challenge involving the detention of personnel, which was managed without operational disruption. The board establishes and oversees risk appetite statements that guide management decisions, ensuring alignment with strategic objectives and adherence to corporate ethics.

Sustainability

The sustainability framework is guided by commitments to the World Gold Council's Responsible Gold Mining Principles (RGMPs) and the Conflict-Free Gold Standard, with external assurance confirming conformance with the RGMPs. The company maintains group-wide ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 certifications and is actively working toward compliance with the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM) by August 2025. In 2024, the organization's MSCI ESG rating was upgraded to AA, placing it in the 81.5th percentile of its peers. A key initiative was the completion of a financial impact assessment for climate-related risks, which modeled the effects of carbon pricing, flooding, and extreme heat on costs and revenues over the current life of mine. This climate financial model, based on IPCC and NGFS scenarios, is integrated into corporate financial planning. The entity also acted on recommendations from its 2023 group Human Rights Risk Assessment. Safety performance for the year included a Total Recordable Injury Frequency of 2.11.

Structure

The corporate structure involves significant partnerships with government entities, including an 80% ownership interest in its Société des Mines de Syama S.A. subsidiary and a 90% interest in its Petowal Mining Company S.A. subsidiary, with the respective governments holding the remaining equity. The company actively utilizes joint ventures to expand its exploration portfolio and de-risk entry into new prospective areas. In 2024, it signed a joint venture agreement with JOFEMA Holdings Limited for the La Debo project and another with SNEPAC for the Bantaco project, both structured as multi-stage earn-ins. The organization is also navigating significant structural changes mandated by new regulations, including a transition to a new mining code that provides for potentially higher state ownership levels, pre-emption rights, and non-dilutable priority dividends for the state. As of the report date, negotiations to finalize the new mining conventions under this code were ongoing.

Source

Resolute Mining Limited - Annual Report - 2024

Syama
80.00%
🇲🇱 Southwest Mali, Mali
operating, open pit and underground
Annual production: 125 - 250 koz au (medium)
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade 2 - 5 g/t (medium)
Doropo
100.00%
🇨🇮 North-Eastern, Côte D'ivoire
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Mako
90.00%
🇸🇳 Eastern Senegal, Senegal
operating, open pit
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: < 1 moz au (very low)
Average Grade 1 - 2 g/t (low)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©