Gold Australia Mid Producer
Australian Securities Exchange (ASX): RMS

Ramelius Resources Ltd.

$3.5B
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Ramelius Resources Ltd. is a mid-tier gold producer headquartered in East Perth, Australia, operating primarily in Australia. The company's portfolio consists of 3 projects, comprising 2 operating mines and 1 development project. Key assets include Mt Magnet and Rebecca-Roe. The business model centers on operating multiple mining projects that feed into centralized processing hubs, enabling operational synergies and cost efficiencies. This approach is supported by a strategy of hauling material from satellite operations to established processing facilities. The organization's culture is defined by a 'fit-for-purpose' and 'can-do' attitude, emphasizing a lean management structure and empowered personnel. Risk management is a key component of the business model, utilizing forward sales contracts and put options to provide revenue certainty and protect against price volatility. The company's operational framework allows for the extension of asset life beyond initial forecasts through technical optimization and additional pumping capacity, demonstrating a focus on maximizing value from existing infrastructure. A core competency is the ability to generate significant cash flow, which supports both shareholder returns and strategic growth initiatives.

Strategy

Strategic direction is centered on creating shareholder value through a combination of organic growth and disciplined, value-accretive acquisitions. A key objective is the continuous replacement and expansion of the ore reserve base, supported by a significant exploration and resource definition budget. Capital allocation is guided by rigorous economic evaluation, as demonstrated by the decision to pursue an expansion study for one asset over a high-cost cutback at another. The company maintains a formal dividend policy targeting a maximum payout of 30% of free cash flow, having returned capital to shareholders for 6 consecutive years. Long-term visibility is provided through a 10-year mine plan for a core operational hub, which underpins investment in sustainable infrastructure. The approach to mergers and acquisitions is highly disciplined, focusing on adding profitable ounces rather than pursuing growth at any cost, with a public record of walking away from transactions that do not meet strict criteria.

Management

Executive leadership includes a Managing Director with over 30 years of industry experience and a Chair with over 35 years of multi-commodity and international experience. The Board of Directors consists of 6 members, 5 of whom are independent, ensuring strong oversight. Governance is structured through 3 primary committees: Audit; Risk & Sustainability; and Nomination & Remuneration, with the latter meeting at least 4 times annually to review and make recommendations on remuneration and performance. The Nomination & Remuneration Committee engages independent external consultants, such as Remsmart, for remuneration benchmarking to ensure market alignment. Management philosophy is characterized by a lean structure and a 'fit-for-purpose' approach, with a focus on empowering personnel. The remuneration framework is directly linked to performance, with short-term incentives tied to specific safety, environmental, production, and financial targets.

Sustainability

A key environmental initiative is the implementation of a hybrid power solution at a core operational hub, incorporating gas, solar, and battery storage systems with provisions for future wind generation to advance decarbonization. The company's commitment to social responsibility is demonstrated through a psychosocial workplace audit and the subsequent implementation of an action plan, alongside ongoing workplace behavior and bystander training. Safety programs are a priority, reflected in a declining trend in the total recordable injury frequency rate and the achievement of a 12-month lost-time injury free milestone. Community engagement includes a commitment to invest up to a set amount per ounce produced. Specific environmental targets are integrated into executive remuneration, including increasing water reuse, achieving zero environmental impact from acid mine drainage, and meeting mine closure plan criteria. The organization also focuses on increasing female representation in the workforce as part of its diversity and inclusion objectives.

Structure

The corporate structure has been shaped by recent strategic transactions, including the acquisition of Musgrave Minerals Limited, which was completed in October 2023 through a scrip and cash offer. In June 2023, the company also completed the acquisition of Breaker Resources NL. A significant strategic investment was made in Spartan Resources Limited in June 2024, initially acquiring an 8.9% interest, which was subsequently increased to 18.35% post-reporting period. The group participates in several unincorporated joint operations for exploration purposes, including arrangements with Chalice Gold Mines Limited for the Nulla South project and with IGO Newsearch Pty Ltd for the Louisa project. A Deed of Cross Guarantee is in place between the parent entity and the majority of its wholly-owned Australian subsidiaries, including Ramelius Operations Pty Limited and Mt Magnet Gold Pty Limited. The company has also explored but not proceeded with potential tie-ups with other entities, including Westgold Resources and Karora Resources, reflecting a disciplined approach to structural changes.

Source

Ramelius Resources - Annual Report - 2024

Mt Magnet
100.00%
🇦🇺 Western Australia, Australia
operating, open pit and underground
Annual production: 125 - 250 koz au (medium)
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade 2 - 5 g/t (medium)
Rebecca-Roe
100.00%
🇦🇺 Western Australia, Australia
development, open pit and underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 2.5 - 5 moz au (medium)
Average Grade 1 - 2 g/t (low)
Edna May
100.00%
🇦🇺 Western Australia, Australia
operating, open pit and underground
Annual production: 125 - 250 koz au (medium)
Resource base: < 1 moz au (very low)
Average Grade 2 - 5 g/t (medium)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©