Gold Canada Junior Developer
TSX Venture Exchange (TSXV): ODV New York Stock Exchange (NYSE): ODV

Osisko Development Corp.

$346.0M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Osisko Development Corp. is a junior gold development company headquartered in Montreal, Canada, operating primarily in Canada. The company's portfolio consists of 3 projects, comprising 2 development and 1 suspended project. Key assets include Cariboo. The organization operates as an exploration and development company focused on advancing past-producing properties toward production. Its business model is centered on curating and progressing a portfolio of development projects with the objective of becoming an intermediate producer. The operational approach emphasizes a staged, lower capital intensity project design featuring scalable infrastructure to mitigate development risks and manage capital deployment in response to economic conditions. This methodology provides an opportunity to maximize margins while systematically advancing assets. The company has experience with various processing technologies, including heap leaching and carbon-in-column plants, as well as test mining and batch vat leaching, demonstrating adaptability to different mineralization types. As a development-stage entity without commercial production, the business model relies on securing external equity and debt financing to fund its evaluation and development activities, making capital market access a critical component of its operational cycle.

Strategy

Strategic focus centers on transitioning from a developer to an intermediate producer through the advancement of its principal assets. A key component of this strategy involves completing an optimized feasibility study for a core project to enhance and streamline mine development, accelerate throughput timelines, and mitigate potential cost pressures. The capital allocation strategy is multifaceted, relying on securing future financing through a combination of asset sales, divestment of portfolio investments, project debt, offtake or royalty financing, and other capital market alternatives. Management has initiated a strategic review of a non-core asset, which includes exploring partnerships or a full or partial sale to generate liquidity. Near-term objectives include completing detailed engineering for critical infrastructure and securing a comprehensive project construction financing package. The enterprise's ability to execute its planned activities is contingent upon its success in these financing efforts, which may otherwise lead to the curtailment of certain development activities.

Management

Executive leadership is headed by a Chief Executive Officer who also serves as the Chair of the Board of Directors. The Board is composed of 6 members, including a Lead Director and a recently appointed independent director. Governance and oversight are exercised through an Audit and Risk Committee, which meets quarterly with management and independent auditors to review financial reporting and internal controls before Board approval. Management structure has seen recent adjustments, including the appointment of a new Vice President of Project Development and a Vice President of Investor Relations, alongside the resignation of the Chief Operating Officer, reflecting an active approach to aligning leadership with corporate priorities. The CEO and CFO are responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) and have formally evaluated these systems as effective, based on the COSO framework. This structured approach to governance underscores a commitment to reliable financial reporting and procedural integrity.

Sustainability

The sustainability framework is built on 3 pillars: being a good neighbor, maintaining an engaged workforce, and ensuring environmental stewardship. The company actively fosters relationships with First Nations, formalized through engagement protocols, relationship agreements, and life-of-project agreements. A key partnership includes a collaboration agreement for the reclamation of a legacy mining site. Community engagement extends to a sustainable workforce initiative providing underground miner training to support local employment and funding for local organizations. Environmental initiatives include the installation of a water treatment plant to manage contact water and effluent, the implementation of management plans for water and waste, and the development of a stewardship society focused on the recovery of local caribou populations and salmon runs. The organization also maintains open dialogue with regulatory bodies to ensure positive relations and compliance with environmental standards.

Structure

The company was formed on November 25, 2020, through the contribution of assets from Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd. Its principal assets are held through wholly-owned operational subsidiaries, including Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. and Tintic Consolidated Metals LLC. A significant structural transaction occurred in 2022 with the acquisition of a new project, which involved purchasing a 75% interest from IG Tintic and acquiring all stock of Chief Consolidated Mining Company, which was subsequently merged into a subsidiary. The corporate structure also includes a significant investment in Falco Resources Limited, representing a 16.0% ownership stake, which is accounted for as an associate investment due to the exercise of significant influence. In 2022, the company entered into a binding term sheet with Osisko Bermuda Limited for a stream agreement on metals produced from one of its projects, securing cash consideration in exchange for a percentage of future production.

Source

Osisko Development Corp. - Management's Discussion And Analysis - 2024

Cariboo
100.00%
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ British Columbia, Canada
development, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade 2 - 5 g/t (medium)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 25 moz ag (very low)
Average Grade < 50 g/t ag (very low)
San Antonio
100.00%
πŸ‡²πŸ‡½ Sonora, Mexico
suspended, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Tintic
100.00%
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Utah, USA
development, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 1 moz au (very low)
Average Grade > 8 g/t (very high)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 25 moz ag (very low)
Average Grade 50 - 100 g/t ag (low)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

Β©