Copper South America Chile Mid Producer
Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX): LUN

Lundin Mining Corp.

$9.7B
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Lundin Mining Corp. is a mid-tier copper producer headquartered in Vancouver, Canada, operating primarily in South America. The company's portfolio consists of 8 projects, comprising 6 operating mines and 2 development projects, in addition to several early-stage exploration prospects. Key assets include Candelaria, Caserones, and Chapada. The organization operates as a diversified base metals mining company with a business model centered on the production and sale of concentrates and cathodes. Its operational approach integrates exploration, development, and production activities, supported by specialized in-house skills in geology, engineering, and metallurgy. Processing capabilities include conventional flotation concentrators and solvent extraction-electrowinning (SX-EW) facilities. Products are marketed globally to smelters and traders through a combination of long-term contracts, with commercial terms negotiated annually, and spot market sales. The enterprise competes for financially attractive mineral properties, skilled personnel, and on the basis of production cost and product quality. Its supply chain relies on a network of large national and multinational suppliers for machinery, equipment, and services, while also implementing local procurement programs where feasible. The company's success is dependent on its ability to develop mineral deposits and maintain a portfolio of high-quality, low-cost operations.

Strategy

The company's strategy focuses on operating, upgrading, and expanding a portfolio of base metal assets, with a particular emphasis on a specific commodity that management believes offers the best long-term supply and demand fundamentals. Growth is pursued through a dual approach of organic development, leveraging in-house exploration expertise to make new discoveries, and accretive acquisitions of producing properties or development prospects. A key objective is to deliver leading returns for shareholders throughout the mining cycle by maintaining a portfolio of high-quality, low-cost operations situated in established jurisdictions. The organization consistently evaluates additional mining, exploration, and project opportunities through various partnership models, including earn-ins and joint ventures. Capital allocation is guided by a dividend policy designed to return a minimum target of 40% of operating cash flow to shareholders after accounting for capital investments, contingent payments, and distributions to partners, subject to board discretion and prevailing financial conditions.

Management

Board governance is structured around a board of 8 directors, of whom 6 are independent, ensuring objective oversight. The board's work is facilitated by 4 standing committees: Audit; Corporate Governance and Nominating; Safety, Sustainability and Technical; and Human Resources/Compensation. The company's operating model delegates day-to-day responsibility to local management teams led by a Managing Director at each operational site, who reports directly to the corporate EVP and Chief Operating Officer. This structure is complemented by a matrix system where local functional leads have indirect reporting lines to their corporate counterparts, ensuring alignment with group-wide standards and strategies. Executive leadership and board members have extensive experience in emerging markets and conduct frequent site visits to maintain direct oversight. The human resources philosophy prioritizes the recruitment and promotion of national talent within host countries, with a majority of site-based leadership roles held by local citizens. A comprehensive Code of Conduct applies to all personnel and contractors to enforce ethical business practices across the organization.

Sustainability

The sustainability framework is anchored by a Responsible Mining Policy and a comprehensive Responsible Mining Management System (RMMS), which is guided by ISO 14001 and ISO 45001 standards. A core safety initiative is the Fatal Risk Management (FRM) program, which targets the prevention of serious injuries by managing 18 identified fatal risks through critical controls and systematic in-field verification. The organization is committed to implementing the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM) and has achieved full conformance for active facilities at several key operations. A key climate action goal is the reduction of absolute Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions by 35% by 2030, relative to a 2019 baseline, a target supported by contracts for 100% renewable electricity at certain major operations. The company's Human Rights Policy aligns with the UN Guiding Principles, with human rights impact assessments and corresponding action plans completed across all sites. A formal Diversity and Inclusion Policy sets a target to achieve and maintain at least 30% female representation on the board and in executive officer positions.

Structure

In January 2025, the company and BHP jointly acquired Filo Corp., subsequently forming a 50/50 joint arrangement named Vicuña Corp. to hold and advance the Filo del Sol and Josemaria projects. This followed the company's 2022 acquisition of Vicuña Resources Inc., which originally held the Josemaria asset. A significant portfolio reshaping was initiated in December 2024 with an agreement to sell the Neves-Corvo and Zinkgruvan operations to Boliden AB, a transaction expected to close in mid-2025. The company increased its ownership in Lumina Copper, owner of the Caserones operation, to 70% in July 2024 by exercising an option to acquire an additional 19% interest from its partner, JX, which retains the remaining 30%. The enterprise also holds an 80% interest in the entities that own the Candelaria operation, with Sumitomo holding the other 20%. A material streaming agreement with Franco-Nevada Corporation covers a portion of the gold and silver production from the Candelaria operation. Following the Filo Transaction, Nemesia S.a.r.l., a private entity, held 19.52% of the company's outstanding shares.

Source

Lundin Mining Corporation - Annual Information Form - 2025

Candelaria
80.00%
🇨🇱 Atacama, Chile
operating, open pit and underground
Annual production: 250 - 500 Mlb Cu (medium)
Resource base: 10000 - 20000 Mlb Cu (high)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Caserones
70.00%
🇨🇱 Atacama, Chile
operating, open pit
Annual production: 250 - 500 Mlb Cu (medium)
Resource base: 4000 - 10000 Mlb Cu (medium)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Chapada
100.00%
🇧🇷 Goiás, Brazil
operating, open pit
Annual production: < 100 Mlb Cu (very low)
Resource base: 4000 - 10000 Mlb Cu (medium)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Eagle
100.00%
🇺🇸 Michigan, USA
operating, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Annual production: < 100 Mlb Cu (very low)
Resource base: < 1000 Mlb Cu (very low)
Average Grade 1 - 1.5 % (medium)
Neves-Corvo
100.00%
🇵🇹 Alentejo, Portugal
operating, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Annual production: < 100 Mlb Cu (very low)
Resource base: 1000 - 4000 Mlb Cu (low)
Average Grade > 2 % (very high)
Zinkgruvan
100.00%
🇸🇪 Örebro, Sweden
operating, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Annual production: < 100 Mlb Cu (very low)
Resource base: < 1000 Mlb Cu (very low)
Average Grade > 2 % (very high)
Josemaria
50.00%
🇦🇷 San Juan, Argentina
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 4000 - 10000 Mlb Cu (medium)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Filo Del Sol
50.00%
🇦🇷 San Juan, Argentina
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 1000 - 4000 Mlb Cu (low)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 2.5 - 5 moz au (medium)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©