Uranium Africa Junior Developer
Australian Securities Exchange (ASX): LOT

Lotus Resources Ltd.

$246.6M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Lotus Resources Ltd. is a junior uranium development company headquartered in Perth, Australia, operating primarily in Africa. The company's portfolio consists of 2 development projects. Key assets include Letlhakane and Kayelekera. The organization's business model is centered on a dual-asset approach, combining a production-ready asset with a large-scale, long-term growth asset. The operational strategy for the near-term asset leverages existing plant and infrastructure from a previous operational period, aiming for an accelerated and cost-effective restart of production. Processing capabilities and technological advantages are being advanced through a Front-End Engineering and Design program and various process optimization workstreams, including ore beneficiation and acid management assessments. This approach is designed to lower operating costs and enhance project economics. The company's competitive positioning is built on its potential to become a long-term supplier with a multi-decade production profile, supported by one of the largest undeveloped mineral resources globally. Operational synergies are sought by applying technical knowledge gained from one asset to refine the processing route for the other, particularly as they share similar regional geology. Risk management is addressed through securing stable fiscal regimes via government agreements and diversifying its project pipeline across different development stages.

Strategy

Strategic focus centers on advancing core objectives across 2 key areas: preparing a primary asset for a production restart and executing a resource growth plan for a second major asset. Near-term priorities include securing offtake agreements with global utilities and traders, with a strategy to balance revenue certainty for debt providers with price exposure for equity investors. The enterprise is progressing a preferred financing strategy, having appointed a debt advisor to assess cost-effective debt options for restart capital and working capital requirements. A key initiative involves connecting the near-term asset to a national grid to access cheaper, predominantly hydro-sourced power, which is a critical component of both the low-cost and low-carbon strategy. For the long-term growth asset, the strategy involves a significant infill drilling program aimed at converting inferred resources to higher-confidence classifications. This is complemented by process optimization work, including ore beneficiation assessments and metallurgical test work, to define a preferred processing flowsheet and development pathway through a new scoping study.

Management

Executive leadership and board structure were recently reorganized to align with the transition from development to the project delivery phase. The management team was strengthened with the appointment of Greg Bittar as Chief Executive Officer, an executive with significant experience in capital markets, debt advisory, and project development. Keith Bowes, the former Managing Director, transitioned to Technical Director to focus on project execution and development, while Grant Davey assumed an Executive Director role to leverage his project development and operations experience. The board is composed of 5 directors, including a Non-Executive Chairman with extensive corporate and securities law experience. Governance is managed through 3 board committees: Audit and Risk; Nomination and Remuneration; and Environment, Social, and Governance. The Nomination and Remuneration Committee was recently reconstituted to consist entirely of independent directors. The board has acknowledged the importance of strengthening independence and plans to appoint additional suitably qualified and independent directors as the company matures.

Sustainability

The organization's sustainability approach is formalized through its annual Sustainability Report, with the third edition prepared in reference to the Global Reporting Initiative Sustainability Standards. The company is advancing its alignment with the Taskforce for Climate-related Financial Disclosure framework and has begun transitioning to the Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards. In its first S&P Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment, the entity achieved an ESG Score of 37, placing it in the 64th percentile of its industry in February 2024. Governance is overseen by a board-level ESG Committee, supported by an ESG Manager. Community engagement initiatives include sponsoring teachers at local schools, providing power and water to a village health center, undertaking mosquito spraying programs, grading local roads, and supplying seedlings for vegetation restoration. The company also provided essential school furniture, uniforms, and textbooks to several schools. Workplace safety remains a key focus, with a pro-active approach to incident prevention through work permits, risk assessments, and daily safety talks, although a TRIFR target was not met in the financial year, prompting further management focus.

Structure

In November 2023, the company completed a merger with A-Cap Energy Limited through a Scheme of Arrangement, a transaction designed to create a leading, focused player by combining a production-ready asset with a large-scale development asset. This acquisition brought A-Cap Energy's subsidiaries, including Lotus Marula Pty Ltd, Wilconi Pty Ltd, and Lotus Marula Botswana Proprietary Limited, under the group's control. Following the merger, the board determined that the interest in the Wilconi Nickel-Cobalt Project, held by subsidiary Wilconi Pty Ltd, was non-core to its strategy. Consequently, the group withdrew from the associated Joint Venture Agreement, with the withdrawal becoming effective on 30 May 2024, to maintain focus on its primary projects. The group's operational structure includes an 85% ownership interest in its key operating subsidiary, Lotus (Africa) Limited. The remaining 15% is held by the government of the host country, as per the finalized Mine Development Agreement.

Source

Lotus Resources - Annual Report - 2024

Letlhakane
100.00%
🇧🇼 Francistown, Botswana
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 80 - 150 mlb U3O8 (high)
Average Grade 0.05 - 0.15 % eU3O8 (low)
Kayelekera
85.00%
🇲🇼 Northern Malawi, Malawi
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 40 - 80 mlb U3O8 (medium)
Average Grade 0.15 - 0.25 % eU3O8 (medium)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©