Li-FT Power Ltd.
Overview
Li-FT Power Ltd. is a junior lithium exploration company headquartered in Vancouver, Canada, operating primarily in Canada. The company's portfolio consists of 2 advanced exploration projects. Key assets include Yellowknife. The company is a mineral exploration entity focused on the acquisition and development of early-stage projects. Its business model relies on raising capital through equity financings, particularly tax-advantaged flow-through shares, to fund exploration activities, as it currently generates no operating revenue. The organization leverages external expertise, utilizing consultants and contractors for specialized skills in geology, drilling, and logistical planning for exploration programs. A key operational characteristic is the evaluation of processing potential early in the exploration cycle, demonstrated by comprehensive metallurgical test work. This testing includes heavy liquid separation, dense media separation, and flotation to assess beneficiation performance and the potential to produce high-grade concentrates. The competitive landscape involves competing with more capitalized entities for attractive properties and investment capital. The enterprise's approach involves systematic exploration to de-risk projects and advance them toward economic viability assessments. Risk management includes diversifying exploration targets across multiple pegmatite complexes to mitigate geological uncertainty.
Strategy
Strategic priorities are centered on advancing mineral properties through systematic exploration, including infill and resource development drilling. A primary objective is to progress key assets by completing continuous metallurgical test work and collecting comprehensive environmental baseline data to support future economic assessments and permitting. The capital allocation approach is heavily weighted towards funding exploration through the issuance of equity, with a notable reliance on flow-through share offerings to finance qualifying expenditures in a tax-efficient manner. Growth is pursued through both organic exploration on existing land packages and strategic consolidation of adjacent properties. This is evidenced by multiple acquisitions and option agreements to expand the company's footprint in prospective areas. The long-term goal is to delineate economically viable deposits. The exploration strategy involves a multi-faceted approach, combining geological targeting models derived from 3D inversions of magnetic data with surface geochemistry, mapping, and prospecting to identify and prioritize drill targets under cover.
Management
Executive leadership is headed by a Chief Executive Officer with extensive exploration experience, including a previous role as an executive vice president of exploration at Kenorland Minerals. The board of directors is composed of 7 members, of whom 4 are considered independent, providing a majority of independent oversight. Board governance is structured through several committees, including an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, which ensure adherence to regulatory and ethical standards. The Audit Committee consists of 4 directors, 3 of whom are independent and all are financially literate, with one member being a retired partner from PricewaterhouseCoopers. The governance framework includes formal procedures for managing conflicts of interest, as several directors and officers are involved with other natural resource companies. The management team's philosophy is rooted in leveraging deep industry experience, with key personnel having held senior roles at companies such as Millennial Lithium Corp., Integra Resources Corp., and McCarthy Tetrault LLP, bringing expertise in project finance, development, and legal affairs.
Sustainability
The organization's approach to sustainability is demonstrated through proactive engagement with Indigenous communities and a focus on environmental due diligence. A formal exploration agreement was established with the Yellowknives Dene First Nation on June 6, 2023, to govern exploration activities. In response to community concerns regarding a culturally significant trail, the company temporarily paused drilling in a specific area to collaborate on mitigation strategies, showcasing a commitment to partnership. Environmental stewardship is integrated into operations through compliance with Type A Land Use Permits and Type B Water Licences, which mandate adherence to project-specific social and environmental management plans. The company is actively conducting multi-year environmental baseline data collection to benchmark against potential project impacts. A Chief Sustainability Officer was appointed on June 1, 2023, to lead these initiatives. These actions reflect a commitment to responsible exploration practices and building constructive relationships with local stakeholders.
Structure
The corporate structure includes 2 wholly-owned operational subsidiaries, Yellowknife Lithium Ltd. and Erex International Ltd., which hold the company's mineral interests. A key structural element is an investor rights agreement established on November 14, 2024, with a strategic investor, granting participation rights in future financings to maintain pro rata ownership and the right to nominate a director if ownership exceeds a 10% threshold. The company has actively pursued growth through transactions, including the acquisition of 136, the parent of Erex, via an amalgamation on November 22, 2022, and the purchase of a project portfolio from North Arrow Minerals Inc. in a transaction dated December 17, 2024. An operator services agreement was entered into with Kenorland Minerals Ltd. on June 11, 2021, engaging them to manage exploration on certain claims. The company also holds an option, dated July 20, 2022, to acquire up to a 70% interest in a project from Harfang Exploration Inc., demonstrating a strategy of using joint ventures and partnerships to advance assets.
Source
Li-ft Power Ltd. - Annual Information Form - 2024
- Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
- The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
- Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
- Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
- Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
- Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
- Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
- Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
- Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
- Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
- koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
- moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
- g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
- usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
- moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
- g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
- usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
- kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
- mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
- %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
- usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
- mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
- % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
- usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
- Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
- Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
- ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
- Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
- Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
- Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
- Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
- Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
- P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
- M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
- Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
- Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
- PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
- Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
- Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
- BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
- NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
- IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
- Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
- AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
- Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
- Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
- NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
- GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
- NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery