Uranium USA Junior Developer
Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX): LAM Australian Securities Exchange (ASX): LAM OTCQX (OTC): LMRXF

Laramide Resources Ltd.

$102.6M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Laramide Resources Ltd. is a junior uranium development company headquartered in Toronto, Canada, operating primarily in USA. The company's portfolio consists of 6 projects, comprising 4 development and 2 advanced exploration projects. Key assets include Churchrock-Crownpoint and Westmoreland. The company's business model centers on the exploration and development of mineral assets, employing a dual-track approach that encompasses both in-situ recovery (ISR) and conventional hard-rock projects. This diversification in extraction methodology provides operational flexibility and mitigates risks associated with a single processing type. A core component of the business involves acquiring advanced-stage projects with significant existing infrastructure and historical data, which accelerates development timelines. The operational approach for ISR-amenable deposits focuses on reversing natural deposition processes through injected solutions, while conventional assets are advanced through traditional development pathways. The enterprise also maintains a portfolio of strategic equity investments in other exploration and development companies, which can be liquidated to provide a non-dilutive source of funding for its own activities. This structure, combining direct project development with strategic investments, supports a multi-faceted approach to value creation and risk management within stable and predictable operating environments.

Strategy

Strategic priorities focus on aggressive resource base expansion and the de-risking of development-stage assets. A key initiative involves large-scale drilling campaigns, such as a planned 12,000-meter program, designed to upgrade resource confidence from inferred to indicated categories, test for extensions between known deposits, and explore for new satellite discoveries. The organization is advancing its in-situ recovery projects through detailed technical evaluations, including a Preliminary Economic Assessment that outlines a long-life, low-capital operation. To enhance technical proficiency, the company secured a government grant for a joint research project with a national laboratory to develop advanced groundwater restoration technology. For its conventional assets, the strategy includes methodically advancing the permitting process, demonstrated by the re-initiation of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement review. Financial strategy is characterized by flexibility, utilizing a mix of equity placements, convertible debt facilities, warrant exercises, and government grants to fund its exploration and development programs without relying on a single capital source.

Management

Executive leadership includes a President and CEO with over 25 years of experience, who has held senior roles at multiple public resource companies. The team was recently strengthened with the 2024 appointment of a Vice-President of Operations and Strategic Development, bringing extensive experience in operational compliance and regulatory oversight from a major industry producer, and a Vice-President of Exploration in 2023 with 19 years of diverse commodity experience. The Board of Directors is composed of 5 members, 4 of whom are independent, ensuring robust oversight. Governance is structured through an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating and Governance Committee. The Audit Committee's charter mandates at least 4 meetings per year and outlines specific procedures for approving non-audit services and handling accounting-related complaints. A shareholder rights plan, re-approved every 3 years, is in place to ensure fair treatment of shareholders in the event of a takeover bid, reflecting a proactive approach to corporate governance.

Sustainability

The company's approach to social responsibility is demonstrated through the execution of a formal Indigenous Land Use Agreement for a key project. This agreement, resulting from a consent process with native title holders, establishes provisions for employment opportunities, cultural heritage protection, and free, prior, and informed consent for ongoing exploration. Environmental stewardship for its in-situ recovery operations is advanced through a joint research project with a national laboratory, funded by a U.S. Department of Energy grant, aimed at developing and demonstrating advanced groundwater restoration technologies. The organization's governance framework is underpinned by a formal Code of Business Ethics and Conduct, which applies to all directors, officers, and employees. This code explicitly addresses anti-bribery, anti-corruption, respect for human rights in all operating locations, and compliance with all applicable laws, including environmental regulations. Permitting for certain projects requires the completion of a comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement, ensuring regulatory and community oversight.

Structure

In 2017, the company acquired a portfolio of advanced-stage in-situ recovery projects through the purchase of NuFuels, Inc. (formerly Hydro Resources, Inc.) from Westwater Resources Inc. The corporate structure was further shaped by the 2018 consolidation of two joint ventures, resulting in 100% ownership of the Murphy Uranium Project by acquiring the remaining interests from Verdant Minerals Ltd. and Rio Tinto Exploration Pty Ltd.; Rio Tinto retains certain clawback and royalty rights on the southern portion of the project. A significant recent strategic move in 2024 was entering into an option agreement with Aral Resources Ltd., providing the right to acquire 100% of the Chu-Sarysu Project, with the company acting as operator during the option period. Key operational subsidiaries include NuFuels, Inc., Westmoreland Resources Pty Ltd, and Tackle Resources Pty Ltd. In March 2025, Boss Energy, an ASX-listed producer, announced it would become a major shareholder, holding an 18.4% interest in the company, citing the strength of a flagship asset.

Source

Laramide Resources Ltd. - Annual Information Form - 2024

Churchrock-Crownpoint
100.00%
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ New Mexico, USA
development, isr
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 40 - 80 mlb U3O8 (medium)
Average Grade 0.15 - 0.25 % eU3O8 (medium)
Westmoreland
100.00%
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Queensland, Australia
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 40 - 80 mlb U3O8 (medium)
Average Grade 0.15 - 0.25 % eU3O8 (medium)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
La Jara Mesa
100.00%
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ New Mexico, USA
development, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 15 mlb U3O8 (very low)
Average Grade 0.15 - 0.25 % eU3O8 (medium)
La Sal
100.00%
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Utah, USA
development, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Chu-Sarysu
100.00%
πŸ‡°πŸ‡Ώ Suzak, Kazakhstan
exploration, isr
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Murphy
100.00%
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Northern Territory, Australia
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

Β©