Copper USA Junior Explorer
TSX Venture Exchange (TSXV): BIG

Hercules Metals Corp.

$138.3M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Hercules Metals Corp. is a junior copper exploration company headquartered in Toronto, Canada, operating primarily in USA. The company's portfolio consists of 1 advanced exploration project. Key assets include Hercules. The organization operates as a junior exploration and development entity focused on advancing mineral prospects. Its business model centers on acquiring and re-evaluating assets with historical exploration data by applying modern, systematic techniques. This approach led to a significant discovery that prompted a strategic shift, reflected in a corporate name change to signify a more diversified portfolio. The company's operational activities are inherently high-risk and speculative, with success contingent upon the discovery of economically recoverable reserves and the ability to secure ongoing financing for exploration programs. The enterprise maintains 100% ownership of its primary asset, subject to a net smelter royalty, half of which is purchasable. This ownership structure provides maximum control over exploration strategy and potential development paths. The business relies on a phased exploration methodology, starting with verification of historical data and progressing to large-scale drilling campaigns designed to test new geological concepts and expand known mineralization. The company's value proposition for investors is tied to the potential for significant value creation through major discoveries, which requires substantial and sustained capital investment in exploration activities.

Strategy

Strategic priorities are centered on systematically advancing a large-scale mineral discovery. The approach involves methodical step-out drilling campaigns designed to vector towards higher-grade zones and define the overall geometry and scale of the mineralized system. Exploration efforts are guided by advanced geophysical surveys, including 3D induced polarization, direct current resistivity, and drone magnetic geophysics, to identify and prioritize prospective targets. The organization leverages external expertise, commissioning independent studies from leading researchers to refine its geological models and generate new high-priority drill targets. A key component of the strategy is the continuous enhancement of the technical team, including an active search for a Vice President of Exploration to lead the next phase of growth. To ensure long-term operational continuity, the company is proactively advancing permitting, including securing approvals for expanded drill programs and initiating an Environmental Assessment process to facilitate future activities on federally administered lands. The entity also plans to launch a joint natural-source IP and magnetotelluric survey to further delineate deep targets ahead of future drill campaigns.

Management

Executive leadership has been significantly strengthened through key appointments and strategic collaborations. The company appointed Charles Greig, a widely recognized geologist and recipient of the 2022 PDAC Bill Dennis Award for the Saddle North discovery, as a Strategic Technical Advisor to guide the 2024 exploration program. The technical team was further augmented with porphyry specialists and 3 geologists seconded from Barrick Gold Corporation, a major strategic partner. The board of directors consists of 4 members—Christopher Paul, Nicholas Tintor, Peter Simeon, and Kelly Malcolm—who were all re-elected at the June 17, 2024 Annual General and Special Meeting. Governance and compensation structures are detailed through related party disclosures, which outline consulting fee arrangements with entities controlled by the CEO and professional fees paid to a law firm where a director is a partner. The company also engages external firms for specialized functions, having retained Momentum IR Corp. for investor relations and corporate communications services. This demonstrates a management approach that combines internal leadership with specialized external expertise to advance its corporate and technical objectives.

Structure

The corporation executed a name change from Hercules Silver Corp. to Hercules Metals Corp. on June 28, 2024, to better reflect its diversified exploration focus. A key structural element is the strategic relationship with Barrick Gold Corporation, which became a significant shareholder through a non-brokered private placement in 2023 and provides technical support via seconded personnel. The company operates in the U.S. through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Anglo-Bomarc, U.S., Inc. This subsidiary is the legal entity that entered into a 20-year mineral lease agreement with the Idaho Department of Lands on March 1, 2025, significantly increasing the company's land position. Anglo-Bomarc also executed a lease option agreement on September 27, 2023, with a local prospector, granting the option to acquire a 100% interest in a separate mineral property. Furthermore, the organization holds a minority investment in Scout Discoveries Corp., a private mineral exploration company, which was valued based on a recent private placement financing. These arrangements illustrate a corporate structure that utilizes a U.S. subsidiary for operational agreements and strategic partnerships to gain access to capital, technical expertise, and prospective ground.

Source

Hercules Metals Corp. - Management’s Discussion And Analysis - 2024

Hercules
100.00%
🇺🇸 Idaho, USA
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 1 moz au (very low)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©