Gold Mexico Junior Producer
TSX Venture Exchange (TSXV): HSTR OTCQX (OTC): HSTXF

Heliostar Metals Ltd.

$237.6M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Heliostar Metals Ltd. is a junior gold producer headquartered in Vancouver, Canada, operating primarily in Mexico. The company's portfolio consists of 6 projects, comprising 2 operating mines, 3 development, and 1 advanced exploration project. Key assets include Ana Paula and Unga. The company operates as a development-stage entity focused on the acquisition, exploration, and advancement of mineral properties. Its business model is transitioning from a pure explorer, funded through equity and asset sales, to an integrated operator by acquiring producing assets. Operational characteristics include a focus on high-grade deposits and a technical approach of re-scoping major projects to optimize extraction methods, such as evaluating underground mining scenarios over previously considered open-pit plans. This involves detailed metallurgical studies, resource modeling, and geotechnical analysis to enhance project economics. A key competitive advantage is the strategic consolidation of large, underexplored land packages, which facilitates comprehensive, district-scale exploration programs. The organization manages market risks, including inflation and exchange rate volatility, through diligent monitoring and adaptive measures. This strategic shift towards production, combined with disciplined exploration, aims to create a diversified and vertically integrated business.

Strategy

Strategic priorities are centered on a dual approach of organic growth and transformative acquisitions. The primary near-term objective involves advancing a wholly-owned, high-grade development project by completing a Preliminary Economic Assessment and other de-risking studies. This includes significant infill and expansion drilling programs and metallurgical test work to support a re-scoped mine plan focused on underground extraction. Concurrently, the enterprise is pursuing a significant expansion of its operational footprint through the strategic acquisition of producing mines and advanced development projects. This M&A activity is designed to accelerate the transition to a revenue-generating operator, improve the economic outlook of its core development asset by eliminating large contingent payments, and establish a multi-asset production profile. Capital allocation is dependent on access to equity markets, with recent private placements and warrant exercises funding ongoing exploration, development, and acquisition initiatives. The overarching strategy is to evolve from a single-asset developer into a multi-jurisdictional producer.

Management

Governance framework is overseen by a Board of Directors responsible for approving key disclosures and strategic decisions. The company maintains a formal conflict of interest policy requiring directors and officers to disclose any potential conflicts and, for directors, to abstain from voting on related matters. All technical information is independently reviewed and approved by designated Qualified Persons, ensuring compliance with national disclosure standards and providing robust technical oversight. Executive compensation for key management, including the CEO, CFO, and Non-Executive Chairman, consists of senior executive fees, non-executive director fees, and performance-based incentives such as bonuses and share-based compensation. Management is tasked with establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting and is responsible for critical accounting judgments, including the valuation of assets, share-based payments, and contingent consideration. This structure emphasizes prudent financial oversight, regulatory compliance, and accountability in technical reporting.

Structure

In March 2023, the company completed the acquisition of 100% of the shares of Aurea Mining Inc., a transaction accounted for as an asset acquisition. This brought a key development asset under the company's control through Aurea's wholly-owned subsidiary, Minera Aurea, S.A. de C.V. A subsequent binding agreement was announced on July 17, 2024, to acquire 100% of the assets of Florida Canyon Gold Inc. for US$5 million. This transformative transaction is set to add 2 producing mines and 2 advanced development projects to the portfolio. A significant condition of the Florida Canyon Gold Inc. deal is the execution of an agreement to eliminate substantial future liabilities. This includes the cancellation of up to US$20 million in contingent milestone payments related to the Aurea Mining acquisition and the termination of an option agreement that carried up to US$150 million in conditional payments and a 2% net smelter returns royalty on a separate project. This strategic restructuring simplifies the company's balance sheet and removes major long-term financial obligations.

Source

Heliostar Metals Limited - Management’s Discussion And Analysis - 2024

Ana Paula
100.00%
🇲🇽 Guerrero, Mexico
development, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 1 - 2.5 moz au (low)
Average Grade 5 - 8 g/t (high)
Unga
100.00%
🇺🇸 Alaska, USA
exploration, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 1 moz au (very low)
Average Grade > 8 g/t (very high)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 25 moz ag (very low)
Average Grade < 50 g/t ag (very low)
La Colorada
100.00%
🇲🇽 Sonora, Mexico
operating
Annual production: < 50 koz au (very low)
Resource base: < 1 moz au (very low)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Annual production: < 1 moz ag (very low)
Resource base: < 25 moz ag (very low)
Average Grade < 50 g/t ag (very low)
San Agustin
100.00%
🇲🇽 Durango, Mexico
operating, open pit
Annual production: < 50 koz au (very low)
Resource base: < 1 moz au (very low)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Annual production: < 1 moz ag (very low)
Resource base: < 25 moz ag (very low)
Average Grade < 50 g/t ag (very low)
San Antonio
100.00%
🇲🇽 Baja California Sur, Mexico
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 1 - 2.5 moz au (low)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Cerro Del Gallo
100.00%
🇲🇽 Guanajuato, Mexico
development
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©