Gold Africa Senior Producer
Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE): HAR New York Stock Exchange (NYSE): HMY

Harmony Gold Mining Company Ltd.

$9.6B
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Harmony Gold Mining Company Ltd. is a senior gold producer headquartered in Randfontein, South Africa, operating primarily in Africa. The company's portfolio consists of 14 projects, comprising 11 operating mines, 2 development, and 1 advanced exploration project. Key assets include Moab Khotsong, Mponeng, and Wafi-Golpu. The business model integrates 74 years of operational experience with a dual focus on conventional mining and the large-scale retreatment of historical tailings facilities. This approach is supported by a comprehensive value chain encompassing exploration, development, processing, and responsible closure. The organization's competitive differentiation is built upon a long, diversified production profile, a robust balance sheet, and a disciplined capital allocation framework. Operational methodology emphasizes a four-layered risk management system to ensure safety and productivity. The enterprise leverages its extensive experience in complex operating environments to manage socio-political challenges effectively. A core competency is the ability to improve asset quality and margins through disciplined project execution and business improvement initiatives, which include enhancing efficiencies and implementing innovative technologies. The company's structure is designed to support both organic growth from its existing asset base and value-accretive acquisitions, aiming to lower its overall risk profile while improving operational metrics.

Strategy

The corporate strategy is anchored by four interdependent pillars: Responsible Stewardship, Operational Excellence, Cash Certainty, and Effective Capital Allocation. Responsible stewardship focuses on embedding ESG principles into all business practices to create shared value. Operational excellence is pursued through disciplined engineering, grade management, and business improvement initiatives to ensure consistent, predictable production and cost control. Cash certainty is maintained through a strong balance sheet, a net debt-to-EBITDA target of less than 1x, and a hedging strategy to mitigate market volatility. The capital allocation framework prioritizes investments in a sequenced manner, starting with safety and optimization, followed by organic growth, debt repayment, value-accretive inorganic growth, and finally, shareholder returns. Investment decisions are governed by strict criteria, including a preference for larger, higher-margin assets, manageable capital intensity, and projects that generate returns exceeding the cost of capital while compensating for risk. The long-term objective is to enhance portfolio quality, expand margins, and diversify the business base.

Management

Executive leadership is headed by CEO Peter Steenkamp, who was appointed on January 1, 2016, and is recognized for his role in the company's growth and success. The board of directors consists of 13 members, with 9 classified as independent non-executive directors, ensuring a strong majority of independent oversight. Governance is structured through 6 standing committees: Audit and risk, Social and ethics, Remuneration, Nomination, Investment, and Technical. The governance framework adheres to the principles of King IV and is designed to ensure ethical leadership and accountability. Executive remuneration is directly linked to performance through a total incentive plan based on a balanced scorecard. This scorecard measures performance against specific, weighted metrics including total shareholder return, production costs, net free cash flow, reserve additions, and key ESG indicators such as safety performance, thereby aligning management incentives with long-term, sustainable value creation for all stakeholders.

Sustainability

The sustainability strategy is centered on a commitment to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2045, supported by a decarbonization plan that includes a renewable energy program targeting 583 MW of capacity. This program is being implemented in phases, with phase 1 already operational and phase 2a scheduled to begin construction in FY25. The company has Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) approved goals to reduce absolute scope 1 and 2 emissions by 63% by FY36. Social initiatives are highlighted by a landmark 5-year wage agreement, the first of its kind in the company's history, which provides long-term labor cost stability. A systemic safety culture transformation program, known as Thibakotsi, is in place to drive progress toward a zero-harm workplace. The organization also established an Employee Share Ownership Plan (ESOP) Trust and a Community Trust to facilitate broader stakeholder value sharing. Environmental stewardship includes best-practice management of 84 tailings storage facilities and a water management strategy that has earned a CDP score of 'A'.

Structure

Major shareholders provide a stable ownership base, with the Public Investment Corporation of South Africa holding 14.72%, Van Eck Associates Corporation holding 11.92%, and African Rainbow Minerals Ltd holding 11.80% as of June 30, 2024. A significant structural change occurred on October 1, 2020, with the acquisition of the remaining South African operations from AngloGold Ashanti Limited, which materially reshaped the company's operational portfolio. The company maintains a key joint venture with Newmont Corporation for the Wafi-Golpu Project, facilitating shared risk and expertise for the development of this asset. In 2024, the ownership structure was further broadened through the approval and issuance of shares to the Harmony ESOP Trust and the Harmony Community Trust, formalizing long-term value-sharing mechanisms with employees and community stakeholders. These structural elements reflect a strategy of combining organic development with strategic acquisitions and partnerships to drive growth and enhance shareholder value.

Source

Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited - Integrated Report - 2024

Moab Khotsong
100.00%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ North West, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: 250 - 500 koz au (high)
Resource base: > 10 moz au (very high)
Average Grade > 8 g/t (very high)
Annual production: < 2 mlb U3O8 (very low)
Resource base: < 15 mlb U3O8 (very low)
Average Grade < 0.05 % eU3O8 (very low)
Mponeng
100.00%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ Gauteng, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: 125 - 250 koz au (medium)
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade > 8 g/t (very high)
Wafi-Golpu
50.00%
πŸ‡΅πŸ‡¬ Morobe, Papua New Guinea
development, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 20000 Mlb Cu (very high)
Average Grade 1 - 1.5 % (medium)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 10 moz au (very high)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Tshepong North
100.00%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ Free State, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: > 10 moz au (very high)
Average Grade 2 - 5 g/t (medium)
Tshepong South
100.00%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ Free State, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: > 10 moz au (very high)
Average Grade 5 - 8 g/t (high)
Doornkop
100.00%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ Gauteng, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade 2 - 5 g/t (medium)
Kalgold
100.00%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ North West, South Africa
operating, open pit
Annual production: < 50 koz au (very low)
Resource base: 2.5 - 5 moz au (medium)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Kusasalethu
100.00%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ Gauteng, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: 2.5 - 5 moz au (medium)
Average Grade 5 - 8 g/t (high)
Target 1
100.00%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ Free State, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: 2.5 - 5 moz au (medium)
Average Grade 2 - 5 g/t (medium)
Hidden Valley
100.00%
πŸ‡΅πŸ‡¬ Morobe, Papua New Guinea
operating, open pit
Annual production: 125 - 250 koz au (medium)
Resource base: 1 - 2.5 moz au (low)
Average Grade 1 - 2 g/t (low)
Annual production: 3 - 7 moz ag (medium)
Resource base: < 25 moz ag (very low)
Average Grade < 50 g/t ag (very low)
Joel
100.00%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ Free State, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: 1 - 2.5 moz au (low)
Average Grade 2 - 5 g/t (medium)
Masimong
100.00%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ Free State, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: < 1 moz au (very low)
Average Grade 2 - 5 g/t (medium)
Eva Copper
100.00%
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Queensland, Australia
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 10000 - 20000 Mlb Cu (high)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 1 moz au (very low)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Kerimenge
100.00%
πŸ‡΅πŸ‡¬ Morobe, Papua New Guinea
exploration, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 1 moz au (very low)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

Β©