Gold Australia Africa Senior Producer
Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE): GFI New York Stock Exchange (NYSE): GFI

Gold Fields Ltd.

$26.7B
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Gold Fields Ltd. is a senior gold producer headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa, operating primarily in Australia and Africa. The company's portfolio consists of 9 projects, comprising 8 operating mines and 1 development project, in addition to several early-stage exploration prospects. Key assets include South Deep and Granny Smith. The business model centers on a diversified portfolio of mining assets managed through a two-layered global functional guidance structure, which replaced a previous three-tiered regional model to enhance agility and standardize operations. The operational approach emphasizes mechanised extraction from both open-pit and underground settings, supported by an Asset Optimisation program aimed at identifying and implementing efficiency improvements across the business. Processing capabilities involve the physical and chemical treatment of ore to produce semi-pure dorΓ© and concentrate, which are then refined externally. Technological integration is a key differentiator, with the use of real-time data analytics, artificial intelligence, remote mining technologies, and collision avoidance systems to improve safety and productivity. The enterprise risk management framework is integrated into all business processes, with formal quarterly reviews by leadership to assess strategic, catastrophic, and emerging risks, ensuring alignment with the company's risk appetite and tolerance levels.

Strategy

Strategic direction is guided by three core pillars: delivering safe, reliable, and cost-effective operations; creating positive social and environmental impact; and growing the value and quality of the asset portfolio. Growth is pursued through a dual focus on brownfields exploration to extend the life of existing operations and greenfields exploration to build a pipeline of early-stage opportunities, supplemented by value-accretive, bolt-on mergers and acquisitions. The capital allocation framework dictates a disciplined approach, prioritizing the maintenance of an investment-grade credit rating, funding for safe and reliable production, and the payment of a base dividend. Any remaining free cash flow is allocated to discretionary growth investments, which must compete for capital against providing additional returns to shareholders. Operational optimization is driven by a formal Asset Optimisation strategy that includes conducting full potential assessments of major assets to identify and prioritize improvements in production and cost efficiencies through targeted investments and the adoption of new technologies.

Management

Executive leadership underwent significant changes, with Mike Fraser assuming the Chief Executive Officer role on 1 January 2024, and Alex Dall's appointment as permanent Chief Financial Officer on 1 March 2025. The board of directors consists of 13 members, with 11 classified as independent non-executive directors, ensuring a strong majority of independent oversight. The roles of Chairperson and CEO are separate, with Yunus Suleman serving as Chairperson. Board governance is structured through 8 distinct committees, including Audit, Risk, Technical, and a dedicated Strategy and Investment Committee to oversee M&A and portfolio management. In 2024, the company transitioned its organizational model from a three-layered regional structure to a two-layered global functional guidance model. This change was designed to standardize work processes, provide stronger functional leadership to operations, and increase organizational agility. Management philosophy is focused on embedding a culture of respect, inclusion, and accountability, supported by leadership development programs like Courageous Safety Leadership.

Sustainability

A multi-year safety improvement plan was initiated following an independent diagnostic, focusing on leadership, risk reduction, capability building, and business partner management. The organization is implementing recommendations from the 2023 Elizabeth Broderick & Co. culture review to foster a respectful and inclusive workplace, overseen by a newly established Respectful Workplace Advisory Council. The company has set 2030 targets for key environmental priorities, including a 30% reduction in net Scope 1 and 2 emissions from a 2016 baseline, a 45% reduction in freshwater withdrawal from a 2018 baseline, and the recycling or reuse of 80% of total water. All operations are certified to the ISO 14001:2015 environmental management standard. Tailings management is aligned with the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM), with a commitment to have all high-priority facilities conformant. The Host Community Value Creation Strategy guides social investment, with a 2030 target to ensure 30% of total value created benefits host communities through local procurement, employment, and socio-economic development programs.

Structure

In October 2024, the company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Osisko Mining to gain full ownership and control of the Windfall project and its associated exploration district. The organization is pursuing a proposed joint venture with AngloGold Ashanti, announced in March 2023, to combine the Tarkwa and Iduapriem mines, which is pending government approval. A key asset, the Gruyere mine, operates as a 50/50 joint venture with Gold Road Resources. The corporate portfolio was streamlined through several divestitures in 2024, including the sale of a 45% stake in the Asanko Gold Mine to Galiano Gold in March, a 24% interest in Rusoro Mining in January, and a 40% stake in the Far Southeast asset. The growth strategy includes maintaining strategic equity positions in several junior exploration companies, such as a 17.5% holding in Tesoro Gold, a 14.9% interest in Torq Resources, and a 17.2% stake in Chakana Copper, to gain exposure to early-stage opportunities.

Source

Gold Fields Limited - Integrated Annual Report - 2024

South Deep
96.40%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ Witwatersrand Basin, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: 250 - 500 koz au (high)
Resource base: > 10 moz au (very high)
Average Grade 2 - 5 g/t (medium)
Granny Smith
100.00%
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Western Australia, Australia
operating, underground
Annual production: 250 - 500 koz au (high)
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade 5 - 8 g/t (high)
St Ives
100.00%
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Western Australia, Australia
operating, open pit and underground
Annual production: 250 - 500 koz au (high)
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade 2 - 5 g/t (medium)
Tarkwa
90.00%
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡­ Tarkwa Basin, Ghana
operating, open pit
Annual production: 250 - 500 koz au (high)
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Agnew
100.00%
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Western Australia, Australia
operating, underground
Annual production: 125 - 250 koz au (medium)
Resource base: 2.5 - 5 moz au (medium)
Average Grade 5 - 8 g/t (high)
Gruyere
50.00%
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Western Australia, Australia
operating, open pit
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: 2.5 - 5 moz au (medium)
Average Grade 1 - 2 g/t (low)
Salares Norte
100.00%
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡± Atacama, Chile
operating, open pit
Annual production: < 50 koz au (very low)
Resource base: 2.5 - 5 moz au (medium)
Average Grade 5 - 8 g/t (high)
Annual production: < 1 moz ag (very low)
Resource base: 25 - 75 moz ag (low)
Average Grade 50 - 100 g/t ag (low)
Cerro Corona
99.53%
πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ͺ Cajamarca, Peru
operating, open pit
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: < 1 moz au (very low)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Annual production: < 100 Mlb Cu (very low)
Resource base: < 1000 Mlb Cu (very low)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Windfall
100.00%
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ QuΓ©bec, Canada
development, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade > 8 g/t (very high)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

Β©