Uranium Canada Junior Explorer
TSX Venture Exchange (TSXV): FUU OTCQX (OTC): FUUFF

F3 Uranium Corp.

$88.5M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

F3 Uranium Corp. is a junior uranium exploration company headquartered in Kelowna, Canada, operating primarily in Canada. The company's portfolio consists of 3 advanced exploration projects. Key assets include Patterson Lake North. The business model centers on being a junior resource issuer focused on the acquisition, exploration, and development of resource properties. The organization embraces a "Project Generator" model, leveraging its technical expertise as an operator to attract financial partners through property option and joint venture agreements. This approach allows for the financing of exploration and potential development. The primary objective is to locate, evaluate, and acquire early-stage properties with the potential to host high-grade mineralization at shallow depths. The operational approach is distinguished by the use of specialized and innovative exploration surveys and interpretations. These techniques include advanced ground electromagnetic and induced polarization geophysical surveys, radon analysis, underwater spectrometer analysis, and radiometric airborne surveys. This technological suite was instrumental in previous successful discoveries made by the technical team. The company's competitive positioning is supported by an award-winning management and technical team with a proven track record of acquiring highly prospective properties and advancing them for potential sale.

Strategy

The organization's strategic goals center on the discovery and development of an economic mineral deposit through its specialized exploration methodology. A core component of the strategy involves the continuous identification, evaluation, and staking of mineral claims in highly prospective geological regions for future exploration. Management's approach is informed by a long-term optimistic outlook on global commodity demand, believing that a future supply deficit will necessitate new discoveries. The entity aims to emulate the success of its predecessor companies by applying its proven exploration techniques to its property portfolio. To enhance shareholder value, the company actively evaluates joint venture partnerships, property acquisitions, and other strategic corporate opportunities. A significant recent strategic initiative involved the spin-out of 17 exploration projects into a newly incorporated, wholly-owned subsidiary. This corporate restructuring was designed to streamline focus, with the parent company retaining a core project area totaling 39,946 hectares, while the new entity advances the other properties. This action exemplifies the strategy of creating value through corporate structuring and focused exploration efforts.

Structure

The corporate structure reflects an active project generator model, utilizing spin-outs and option agreements to advance its portfolio. On August 15, 2024, the company completed a significant spin-out of a newly incorporated, wholly-owned subsidiary, F4 Uranium Corp., which now holds 17 of the company's exploration projects. The parent entity was originally incorporated on September 23, 2013, following a reorganization of Fission Uranium Corp. A key financing and strategic relationship was established on October 18, 2023, through a $15,000,000 convertible debenture with Denison Mines Corp. The organization has entered into several option agreements with partners, including a May 2023 agreement granting SKRR Exploration Inc. the opportunity to acquire up to a 70% interest in an exploration property. A similar agreement was made in May 2024 with Canadian GoldCamps Corp., allowing it to earn up to a 70% interest in another property. The company also maintains an active option agreement with Traction Uranium Corp., established in December 2021, for it to earn up to a 70% interest in a project, while a second option agreement with Traction for a different property was terminated in the prior fiscal year.

Source

F3 Uranium Corp. - Management’s Discussion & Analysis - 2024

Patterson Lake North
100.00%
🇨🇦 Saskatchewan, Canada
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade > 0.5 % eU3O8 (very high)
Broach
100.00%
🇨🇦 Saskatchewan, Canada
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Minto
100.00%
🇨🇦 Saskatchewan, Canada
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©