Gold Copper Australia Senior Producer
Australian Securities Exchange (ASX): EVN

Evolution Mining Ltd.

$10.5B
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Evolution Mining Ltd. is a senior gold and copper producer headquartered in Sydney, Australia, operating primarily in Australia. The company's portfolio consists of 6 operating mines, in addition to several early-stage exploration prospects. Key assets include Cowal and Ernest Henry. The business model is centered on operating a portfolio of up to 8 assets in Tier 1 jurisdictions, with a strategic focus on low-cost production to ensure resilience through market cycles. The enterprise emphasizes financial discipline, prioritizing margin and appropriate capital returns. A key operational characteristic is the management of geological, operational, and financial risks, supported by a high-performing culture. Recently, the company has increased its exposure to a secondary commodity to enhance cash flow stability across commodity price cycles. Sustainability is integrated into all business functions, from exploration to closure, underpinning the long-term value creation strategy. The operational approach involves building a portfolio that generates superior returns and maintaining a reputation for delivering value to all stakeholders.

Strategy

The entity's strategy focuses on building and maintaining a portfolio of up to 8 assets in Tier 1 jurisdictions that generate superior returns. Growth is pursued through a dual approach of organic discovery and strategic, value-accretive acquisitions. A core principle is disciplined capital allocation, centered on margin and appropriate returns to prosper through economic cycles. The organization integrates sustainability into all business activities, with a formal commitment to achieve Net Zero emissions by 2050, supported by a 30% reduction target for 2030. Near-term objectives include advancing key expansion and development projects to establish larger, lower-cost production bases. The long-term vision is to create a premier global company by driving a high-performing culture and taking calculated geological, operational, and financial risks.

Management

Executive leadership includes a Managing Director and CEO with over 34 years of resources sector experience and an Executive Chair with a track record of developing a prior company from a $100 million market capitalization to a valuation exceeding $2 billion. As of June 30, 2024, the Board of Directors comprises 8 members, with 6 being independent non-executive directors. A new female non-executive director was appointed effective July 1, 2024, supporting the board diversity target of no less than 30% female representation. Governance is structured through Audit, Risk and Sustainability, and Nomination and Remuneration Committees. The Risk and Sustainability Committee meets at least 3 times annually to oversee the entity's risk management systems and sustainability performance. The remuneration framework links executive compensation to performance, with approximately 30% of the annual Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) tied to specific sustainability targets, including progress towards Net Zero commitments. The risk management framework is aligned with ISO 31000 guidelines, with the Board conducting an annual review of the Group Risk Register.

Sustainability

The organization's climate action strategy is defined by a commitment to achieve Net Zero Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2050, with an interim target of a 30% reduction by 2030 against an adjusted FY20 baseline; a ~12% reduction has been achieved as of FY24. Workplace safety initiatives resulted in a ~13% year-on-year improvement in the Total Recordable Injury Frequency (TRIF). Indigenous relations are advanced through formal agreements and collaborative forums, including an inaugural First Nations Summit held in FY24 to enhance partnership and cultural understanding. Environmental stewardship is demonstrated by a 45% improvement in freshwater usage intensity compared to the FY20 baseline. Tailings management practices are aligned with the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM) and are overseen by a dedicated TSF Governance Committee. The entity reports against GRI and TCFD frameworks and is actively preparing for mandatory disclosures under IFRS S1/S2 and the Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards (ASRS).

Structure

In December 2023, the company completed the acquisition of an 80% interest in the Northparkes operations from CMOC Group Limited; Sumitomo Group retains the remaining 20% interest through a longstanding joint venture. The acquisition was funded through a $525 million institutional placement and a new $200 million term debt facility. During FY24, the organization entered into an earn-in agreement with Northern Superior Resources Ltd concerning the October Gold Project. A separate earn-in agreement was established with Red Fox Resources Pty Ltd for the Cloncurry North Project, aiming to discover incremental production sources. The entity is also jointly developing the Mt Rawdon Pumped Hydro Project in partnership with ICA Partners to convert a mine site into a renewable energy asset. In the same period, the company divested its interest in the Cue JV to Ramelius Resources.

Source

Evolution Mining Limited - Annual Report - 2024

Cowal
100.00%
🇦🇺 New South Wales, Australia
operating, open pit and underground
Annual production: 250 - 500 koz au (high)
Resource base: 5 - 10 moz au (high)
Average Grade 1 - 2 g/t (low)
Ernest Henry
100.00%
🇦🇺 Queensland, Australia
operating, underground
Annual production: 100 - 250 Mlb Cu (low)
Resource base: 1000 - 4000 Mlb Cu (low)
Average Grade 1 - 1.5 % (medium)
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: 2.5 - 5 moz au (medium)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Northparkes
80.00%
🇦🇺 New South Wales, Australia
operating, open pit and underground
Annual production: < 100 Mlb Cu (very low)
Resource base: 10000 - 20000 Mlb Cu (high)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: < 50 koz au (very low)
Resource base: 1 - 2.5 moz au (low)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Red Lake
100.00%
🇨🇦 Ontario, Canada
operating, underground
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: 2.5 - 5 moz au (medium)
Average Grade > 8 g/t (very high)
Mungari
100.00%
🇦🇺 Western Australia, Australia
operating, open pit and underground
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: 1 - 2.5 moz au (low)
Average Grade 2 - 5 g/t (medium)
Mt Rawdon
100.00%
🇦🇺 Queensland, Australia
operating, open pit
Annual production: 50 - 125 koz au (low)
Resource base: < 1 moz au (very low)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©