Nickel Junior Canada Explorer
TSX Venture Exchange (TSXV): EVNI OTCQX (OTC): EVNIF

EV Nickel Inc.

$21.5M
Last updated: 28 September 2025

Overview

EV Nickel Inc. is a junior nickel exploration company headquartered in Toronto, Canada, operating primarily in Canada. The company's portfolio consists of 1 development project. Key assets include Shaw Dome. The company's business model is centered on being an independent exploration entity focused on acquiring and advancing mineral properties. A key operational characteristic is a dual-track development approach designed to de-risk both high-grade, smaller-scale deposits and large-scale, lower-grade mineralized systems. The organization differentiates itself through a focus on developing and integrating innovative, low-carbon processing technologies directly into its exploration and development strategy. This includes advancing proprietary processing methods intended to reduce environmental impact and potentially generate secondary revenue streams through carbon management. The operational approach involves systematic exploration, including geophysical and geochemical analysis, followed by targeted drill programs to define and expand mineralized zones. This model aims to add value by advancing assets through critical development milestones, leveraging technical innovation to enhance project economics and appeal to partners or acquirers focused on sustainable resource development. The enterprise actively seeks non-dilutive government funding to support its research and development in these advanced processing technologies, further enhancing its unique position.

Strategy

The organization's strategic direction is built upon a 2-track development plan. The first track focuses on advancing high-grade deposits toward the production of low-carbon minerals. The second track aims to develop large-scale mineral resources integrated with a Carbon Capture and Storage project, creating a potential for carbon credits to supplement revenue from mineral production. Exploration priorities involve systematic programs consisting of geophysical surveys, surface mapping, and diamond drilling to expand known mineralized zones and test new targets. Capital allocation, as demonstrated by the use of proceeds from recent financings, is directed toward completing multi-phase exploration programs, conducting metallurgical test work, and advancing technical studies for both strategic tracks. The company also pursues non-dilutive funding through government programs to accelerate research into innovative extraction and carbon sequestration methods, which is a core component of its long-term value creation strategy. This approach is designed to position the company as a leader in developing mineral projects with a significantly reduced carbon footprint.

Management

Executive leadership recently underwent a significant transition, with the President and Chief Executive Officer resigning in March 2024. A member of the Board of Directors was appointed as interim Chief Executive Officer, ensuring leadership continuity while a search for a permanent replacement is conducted. The company's governance framework includes policies to manage potential conflicts of interest, as directors may also serve on the boards of other resource companies. In such cases, the conflicted director is required to abstain from voting on the relevant matter. Compensation philosophy for directors and officers incorporates long-term incentives, including restricted share units and stock options with multi-year vesting periods, to align management's interests with long-term shareholder value creation. The departure of the former CEO triggered the immediate vesting of a portion of his options and the expiration of his unvested restricted share units, demonstrating the enforcement of established compensation agreements.

Sustainability

A core element of the company's strategy is the development of a low-carbon mineral production model, supported by specific technological initiatives. The organization is actively advancing bioleaching, a process that utilizes bacteria to extract minerals with potentially zero carbon emissions, and has engaged an engineering partner to manage a bench-scale optimization test program. A second major initiative focuses on developing an integrated carbon capture and storage process. Research has identified highly reactive, magnesium-rich minerals, including brucite and hydrotalcite, within host rocks, indicating a natural potential to sequester significant amounts of CO2. The company has secured non-dilutive funding of $500,000 through the Critical Minerals Innovation Fund to specifically advance these two research streams. In addition to these technological pursuits, the enterprise conducts ongoing surface water baseline monitoring as a proactive measure for future environmental permitting requirements, demonstrating a commitment to environmental stewardship throughout the project lifecycle.

Structure

The company was incorporated in January 2021 and has since grown through targeted acquisitions. In March 2021, the entity acquired its initial property package from Rogue Resources Inc. A subsequent major transaction occurred on April 1, 2022, when the company acquired an extensive package of staked mining claims from an arm's-length, privately held exploration company. The consideration for this acquisition included cash, 2.5 million shares, and the establishment of a 2.75% net-smelter royalty agreement with the vendor. This royalty agreement includes a provision allowing the company to re-purchase 50% of the royalty for a fixed cash payment. In September 2023, the company settled a final resource payment owed to Rogue Resources Inc. related to the 2021 acquisition by issuing 3,267,016 common shares. As of June 30, 2024, 2.5 million shares related to the 2022 acquisition remain held in escrow, scheduled for release over subsequent years.

Source

Ev Nickel Inc. - Management’s Discussion And Analysis - 2024

Shaw Dome
100.00%
🇨🇦 Ontario, Canada
development
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: Premium
Average Grade < 0.6 % Ni (very low)
Last update: 4 July 2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are estimates and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©