Uranium USA Junior Producer
TSX Venture Exchange (TSXV): EU NASDAQ (NASDAQ): EU

Encore Energy Corp.

$515.7M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Encore Energy Corp. is a junior uranium producer headquartered in Corpus Christi, United States, operating primarily in USA. The company's portfolio consists of 7 projects, comprising 1 operating mine, 2 development, and 4 advanced exploration projects. Key assets include South Texas Integrated Isr and Dewey Burdock. The business model is centered on domestic in-situ recovery (ISR) extraction, leveraging a network of licensed central processing plants (CPPs). This "hub-and-spoke" operational approach allows for processing materials from multiple satellite facilities, creating significant operational synergies and adaptability. The organization utilizes a proprietary, environmentally conscious ISR process employing an oxygen and sodium bicarbonate lixiviant at a near-neutral pH, distinguishing it from competitors who may use harsher chemicals. Further technological differentiation is achieved through the use of low-temperature, zero-emission rotary vacuum drying systems for final product preparation, similar to those used in the pharmaceutical industry. This focus on advanced, lower-impact technology and a multi-facility operational framework positions the company as one of only a few domestic producers with more than one operational extraction facility. The enterprise's structure is designed for phased growth and rapid response to market conditions, supported by its integrated processing capabilities and strategic asset base.

Strategy

The corporate strategy focuses on building domestic extraction capacity through a phased development of a series of production facilities, complemented by selective, accretive merger and acquisition activities. Since December 2020, the company has completed 4 significant transactions to drive growth and shareholder value. A key strategic pillar involves streamlining operations and rationalizing the asset base through a non-core asset divestment program, which provides non-dilutive funding to strengthen the financial position. Operational priorities emphasize optimizing extraction results and managing costs through continuous improvement systems. The commercial strategy formalizes a strong baseload contracting approach, leveraging its status as a reliable multi-facility domestic supplier to secure revenue irrespective of market volatility. Management aims to grow its contract portfolio with new multi-year, hybrid, market-based agreements that maximize profit potential while protecting against price declines, ensuring a stable income base to support sustained operations and future expansion over the next decade.

Management

Executive leadership recently transitioned, with the Chief Legal Officer, Robert Willette, appointed as Acting Chief Executive Officer on March 2, 2025, succeeding the former CEO. Mr. Willette brings extensive legal, compliance, and corporate governance experience from his prior roles as Chief Legal Officer at ProFrac Holdings Corp. and CARBO Ceramics, Inc. The governance framework is adapting to new regulatory requirements after the company became a domestic issuer and a large accelerated filer as of January 1, 2025, making it subject to Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) compliance. In its first assessment under these new standards, management identified material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2024, related to general information technology controls and process-level controls. A comprehensive remediation plan is underway, involving the hiring of additional trained resources, engaging third-party consultants to enhance control design and testing, and implementing new policies and monitoring activities to strengthen the control environment. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors provides oversight for these remediation efforts and other risk management functions.

Sustainability

The organization's sustainability approach is anchored in its use of in-situ recovery (ISR) technology, which is characterized as a minimally invasive and environmentally responsible extraction method. This process utilizes a lixiviant composed of oxygen and sodium bicarbonate in native groundwater, avoiding harsher chemicals and operating at a near-neutral pH to minimize environmental impact. A key environmental commitment involves a comprehensive groundwater restoration process using reverse osmosis technology, which preserves approximately 95% of the groundwater at the conclusion of the full production and restoration cycle. In October 2024, the company released its inaugural sustainability report, which included a preliminary assessment of Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions. This report establishes a commitment to complete a full baseline assessment of Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions by the end of calendar year 2026. The company also focuses on human capital development, offering employees ongoing training, continuing education, and opportunities for internal promotion to attract and retain talent.

Structure

The corporate structure has been actively shaped by strategic transactions. In February 2023, the company completed a major asset acquisition from Energy Fuels for $120 million, consisting of $60 million in cash and a $60 million secured convertible promissory note. This was followed by a strategic divestiture in July 2023, when the organization sold its subsidiary, Neutron Energy, Inc., to Anfield Energy, Inc. for cash and equity consideration. A significant joint venture was formed in February 2024, when the company sold a 30% interest in its Alta Mesa and Mesteña Grande projects to Boss Energy for $60 million, creating the JV Alta Mesa LLC, for which the company serves as manager with a 70% retained interest. This partnership also included a direct equity investment of $10 million from Boss Energy into the company. The company's acquisition of Azarga Uranium Corp. was finalized in 2021. Operationally significant subsidiaries include Metamin Enterprises US Inc., which holds various prospective properties, and UColo, which holds key project assets.

Source

Encore Energy Corp. - Form 10-k - 2024

South Texas Integrated Isr
100.00%
🇺🇸 Texas, USA
operating, isr
Annual production: < 2 mlb U3O8 (very low)
Resource base: < 15 mlb U3O8 (very low)
Average Grade 0.15 - 0.25 % eU3O8 (medium)
Dewey Burdock
100.00%
🇺🇸 South Dakota, USA
development, isr
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 15 mlb U3O8 (very low)
Average Grade 0.05 - 0.15 % eU3O8 (low)
Gas Hills
100.00%
🇺🇸 Wyoming, USA
development, isr
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 15 - 40 mlb U3O8 (low)
Average Grade 0.05 - 0.15 % eU3O8 (low)
Mesteña Grande
70.00%
🇺🇸 Texas, USA
exploration, isr
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 15 mlb U3O8 (very low)
Average Grade 0.15 - 0.25 % eU3O8 (medium)
Aladdin
100.00%
🇺🇸 Wyoming, USA
exploration, isr
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Centennial
100.00%
🇺🇸 Colorado, USA
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Juniper Ridge
100.00%
🇺🇸 Wyoming, USA
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©