Lithium Canada Junior Developer
TSX Venture Exchange (TSXV): ETL OTCQX (OTC): EEMMF

E3 Lithium Ltd.

$80.8M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

E3 Lithium Ltd. is a junior lithium development company headquartered in Calgary, Canada, operating primarily in Canada. The company's portfolio consists of 4 projects, comprising 1 development and 3 advanced exploration projects. Key assets include Clearwater and Bashaw. The company's business model leverages operational methodologies and infrastructure analogous to the established energy industry, providing access to a sophisticated regulatory framework, a skilled workforce, and existing social license for resource extraction. Its processing approach is centered on Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE) technology, which involves pumping feedstock from underground reservoirs, extracting the target mineral, and reinjecting the depleted process fluids back into the same formation to provide pressure support and minimize surface footprint. A key operational characteristic is a dual-track technology strategy, prioritizing a commercially ready third-party DLE sorbent for its initial facility to ensure a viable path to market, while concurrently advancing its proprietary sorbent technology for potential deployment in subsequent facilities. This pragmatic approach is designed to de-risk initial development and accelerate commercialization. The integrated process has been validated through pilot-scale testing, which successfully demonstrated the capability to produce high-purity, battery-quality products from the feedstock.

Strategy

Strategic priorities for 2025 are centered on 5 key initiatives aimed at advancing the first commercial facility towards a construction decision. The plan includes progressing engineering for a feasibility study, constructing and operating a fully integrated demonstration facility to validate the DLE system at scale, and submitting requisite environmental and operational license applications to regulators. A significant component of the strategy involves leveraging non-dilutive capital, having successfully secured multiple grants and contributions from federal and provincial government programs to de-risk technology scale-up and support critical infrastructure development. Management is also focused on advancing discussions with potential strategic partners and securing future offtake agreements to underpin project financing and market entry. A further strategic element is the pursuit of downstream value creation, exemplified by a joint development agreement signed in 2024 with a battery technology company to co-develop a pilot plant for producing metallic anodes and assess the economics of a commercial battery facility.

Management

Governance is overseen by a 6-member Board of Directors, with 5 members identified as independent, ensuring strong oversight and alignment with shareholder interests. The board's structure includes 3 standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Governance Committee, each composed of independent directors to guide financial reporting, executive remuneration, and corporate governance policies. Executive leadership is complemented by board members with deep, relevant industry and policy experience, including a former provincial Minister of Energy and Minerals and a former Chief Commercial Officer from a major global specialty chemical and mineral producer. The company utilizes a shareholder-approved Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan to align the interests of directors, officers, and employees with long-term value creation. The Chief Development Officer serves as the designated qualified person under national regulatory standards, responsible for reviewing and approving technical disclosures.

Sustainability

The organization's approach to sustainability is integrated into its core operational design. A key environmental feature is the planned use of a closed-loop system where processed fluids are reinjected into the source reservoir, which serves to maintain pressure and minimize freshwater consumption and surface disposal. The central processing facility is strategically planned for a brownfield site, repurposing previously disturbed land to reduce new environmental impact. A significant initiative is the plan to create a zero-waste facility by investigating the sale of a primary solid byproduct to the cement industry, thereby turning a waste stream into a commercial product. The company has also developed a social license strategy that includes proactive and voluntary engagement with First Nations to address values and explore economic development opportunities. Further demonstrating its commitment to industry best practices, the enterprise actively participates in an international technical committee dedicated to developing standardized methods for product quality determination.

Structure

In March 2025, the company finalized a Project Completion Agreement with Imperial Oil to secure rights and lease agreements for essential freehold mineral tenure, concluding a collaboration that began in June 2022 with a strategic investment and warrant issuance by the partner. This agreement provides critical access for development and streamlines land tenure. A significant strategic partnership was formed in August 2024 through a Joint Development Agreement with Pure Lithium Corporation, a battery technology firm. This collaboration aims to advance the design of a lithium metal anode and battery pilot plant and to conduct a preliminary economic assessment for a commercial-scale facility, representing a key move toward downstream vertical integration. The corporate structure is also supported by a significant C$27 million strategic investment from the Government of Canada’s Strategic Innovation Fund, announced in November 2022, to de-risk the development and scale-up of its core processing technology and facility.

Source

E3 Lithium Ltd. - Annual Information Form - 2024

Clearwater
100.00%
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Alberta, Canada
development, brine extraction
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 500 - 2000 kt LCE (medium)
Average Grade very low (very low)
Bashaw
100.00%
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Alberta, Canada
exploration, brine extraction
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 5000 kt LCE (very high)
Average Grade very low (very low)
Estevan
100.00%
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Saskatchewan, Canada
exploration, brine extraction
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 2000 - 5000 kt LCE (high)
Average Grade low (low)
Rocky
100.00%
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ Alberta, Canada
exploration, brine extraction
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 500 - 2000 kt LCE (medium)
Average Grade very low (very low)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

Β©