Uranium · Mid-Tier · Developer · Canada
Last updated 21 June 2026
Data compiled from public filings — information only, not investment advice. AI‑assisted; see methodology.
Portfolio Aggregate · 1 project
Portfolio mode — asset rows are for context only; tab totals use the company aggregation.
Denison Mineral Reserves and Resources
Portfolio · Development
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Canadian uranium developer and producer whose interests are concentrated in the eastern Athabasca Basin of northern Saskatchewan: direct interests in 39 mineral properties comprising 256 claims over approximately 457,000 hectares, plus indirect interests through a 50% ownership of JCU. The flagship is the 95%-owned Wheeler River project hosting the Phoenix ISR deposit and the Gryphon underground deposit. Denison also holds 22.50% of McClean Lake, where SABRE mining restarted in July 2025 and which owns the McClean Lake mill, 25.17% of Midwest, and 70.55% of Waterbury Lake. Reserves and resources follow CIM definitions under NI 43-101 and are stated at December 31, 2025 on both a 100% basis and a Denison-share basis. At year end Denison held 1,700,000 lb U3O8 of physical uranium investments plus 145,926 lb of concentrate inventory from its share of McClean Lake production, and had sales commitments for 550,000 lb in 2026 and 250,000 lb in 2027.
Portfolio Aggregate
Multiple effective dates · exclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Operating · 3 projects
McClean North
Asset · Operating · Ownership 22.5%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
The MLJV's producing deposit, mined by the joint venture's patented SABRE surface-access borehole method. A high-pressure water jet is lowered through a sub-half-metre borehole to erode the mineralised horizon, creating cavities up to four metres in diameter; cuttings are lifted to surface as a slurry and screened, and each mined cavity is backfilled with a cemented mixture. Commercial mining restarted in July 2025 after a 2021 field test recovered approximately 1,500 tonnes of ore grading 4% to 11% U3O8. The resource estimate is supported by the January 2007 McClean North Technical Report and has not been re-estimated for the mining that commenced in 2025, so it does not reflect depletion.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025 · exclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
McClean Ore Stockpile
Asset · Operating · Ownership 22.5%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Surface stockpile of mined ore at the McClean Lake site, carried as a proven mineral reserve. The estimate was prepared from the year-end stockpile survey reported by Orano Canada, the MLJV operator, rather than from a technical report. It is the only proven reserve Denison holds outside Phoenix.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025 · exclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
McClean Lake
District · Operating · Ownership 22.5%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
22.50%-held joint venture on the eastern edge of the Athabasca Basin approximately 750 km north of Saskatoon, operated and managed by Orano Canada. The MLJV owns the McClean Lake mill and a group of deposits including Sue D, Sue E, Sue F and McClean North. In January 2024 the MLJV approved a restart of uranium mining using its patented SABRE surface-access borehole method at McClean North, and commercial production was announced in July 2025: 4,392 tonnes of high-grade ore extracted on a 100% basis (Denison's share 988 tonnes) yielding 648,558 lb U3O8 of finished product (Denison's share 145,926 lb) at an operating cash cost of about $36/lb U3O8. Orano holds a 10-year CNSC licence to June 30, 2027 covering McClean and Midwest, authorising SABRE mining of the McClean North deposits and care and maintenance at Midwest.
Mining metrics
Multiple effective dates · exclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Royalties & streams
All royalty and stream interests in the database that refer to this asset by name.
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Development · 11 projects
Gryphon
Asset · Pre-feasibility · Ownership 95%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Basement-hosted uranium deposit approximately 3 km northwest of Phoenix at Wheeler River, planned as an underground mine. Access is via two blind-bored shafts - a production shaft for personnel, supplies, ore and waste hoisting and fresh air, and a dedicated ventilation and secondary-egress shaft - with a composite steel/concrete liner grouted into basement rock. The mine is divided into five blocks (E Zone, Lower D, Upper and Lower Main, Upper SW), each mined bottom-up by longhole methods, producing approximately 605 t/d of ore and 330 t/d of waste at steady state. Ore is hoisted and trucked to the McClean Lake mill; a two-year ramp-up to a full production rate of 9 million lb U3O8 per year is planned. Processing at McClean Lake requires a toll milling agreement that is not yet established and regulatory approvals not yet obtained, plus certain mill modifications. The Gryphon PFS Update reports a pre-tax IRR of 41.4% and after-tax IRR of 37.6% with a 22-month after-tax payback.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025 · inclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Phoenix
Asset · Feasibility · Ownership 95%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
High-grade unconformity-hosted uranium deposit at Wheeler River, planned as an in-situ recovery operation - the first ISR uranium mine in Canada. The 2023 Phoenix feasibility study established a 10-year mine life on proven and probable reserves of 56.7 million lb U3O8 (219,000 tonnes at 11.7% U3O8) with a base case pre-tax IRR of 105.9% and adjusted after-tax IRR of 90.0%. The Zone A high-grade domain is estimated to contain 56.3 million lb U3O8 in measured and indicated resources at an average grade of 46.0% U3O8. Uranium-bearing solution from the wellfield feeds an adjacent self-contained processing plant. A January 2026 capital update raised total initial capital to about $700 million - roughly $100 million pre-FID and $600 million post-FID - at AACE Class 2 precision, with the post-FID IRR at 73%. Grid power arrived in January 2026 and the CNSC approved the environmental assessment and issued the Licence to Prepare a Site and Construct in February 2026, the first Canadian uranium mine approved for construction in over 20 years. FID had not been taken at the reporting date.
Mining metrics
Multiple effective dates · inclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Midwest Main
Asset · Development · Ownership 25.17%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
The higher-grade of the two Midwest deposits and the subject of the August 2025 Preliminary Economic Assessment assessing in-situ recovery mining, which the AIF describes as a technically sound and economically robust means of extracting significant production with low initial capital costs, a high rate of return and rapid payback. Resources were estimated at a 0.10% U3O8 (0.085% U) cut-off grade. Planned 2026 work includes a feasibility-level assessment of the SABRE mining method alongside the ISR case.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025 · exclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
THT (J Zone)
Asset · Development · Ownership 70.55%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Tthe Heldeth Túé deposit, formerly J Zone, on the Waterbury Lake property, supported by a Preliminary Economic Assessment effective October 30, 2020. The indicated resource was estimated at a 0.10% U3O8 cut-off grade. It is Denison's largest resource outside Wheeler River on a Denison-share basis, at 9,000 thousand pounds U3O8. No mining method is stated for this deposit in the AIF.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025 · exclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Midwest A
Asset · Development · Ownership 25.17%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
The second Midwest deposit, a lower-grade indicated resource with a small but very high-grade inferred component averaging 5.8% U3O8. Resources were estimated at a 0.10% U3O8 (0.085% U) cut-off grade and are supported by the August 2025 Midwest Property PEA. No mining method is stated for this deposit in the AIF.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025 · exclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Sue D
Asset · Development · Ownership 22.5%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Uranium deposit on the McClean Lake property supported by the Sue D Report dated March 31, 2006. Indicated and inferred resources were both estimated at a 0.10% U3O8 cut-off grade. Denison's share of the inferred resource rounds to nil. No mining method is stated for this deposit in the AIF.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025 · exclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Sue F
Asset · Development · Ownership 22.5%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Uranium deposit on the McClean Lake property, formerly known as Caribou, supported by the 2005 McClean Technical Report. The indicated resource was estimated at a 0.10% U3O8 cut-off grade. No mining method is stated for this deposit in the AIF, so no extraction type is assigned.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025 · exclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Sue E
Asset · Development · Ownership 22.5%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Uranium deposit on the McClean Lake property supported by the 2005 McClean Technical Report, with the inferred resource estimated at a 0.10% U3O8 cut-off. The operator conducted confirmatory drilling on a portion of the Sue E resource outside the designated pit and in late 2006 submitted a preliminary analysis detailing an inferred resource of approximately 2 million pounds on a 100% basis in that area, against the 7.3 million pounds in the February 2006 technical report. The resource has not been re-estimated using the newer drill information.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Wheeler River
District · Development · Ownership 95%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Denison's flagship project, 95%-owned and Denison-operated, comprising 19 contiguous mineral claims over 11,720 hectares in the eastern Athabasca Basin about 600 km north of Saskatoon and 35 km northeast of the Key Lake mill along Highway 914. It hosts the Phoenix ISR deposit and, about 3 km northwest, the Gryphon underground deposit. The property lies within Treaty 10, English River First Nation traditional territory and the Métis homeland, and is covered by impact-benefit type agreements signed with ERFN (2023), KML and Pinehouse (2024) and the Métis Parties and YNLR/Athabasca Communities (2025). Wheeler River is subject to Saskatchewan Crown mineral royalties and a 10% net profits interest held by the WRJV in proportion to participant interests, of which Denison is also a beneficiary; there are no back-in rights or third-party royalties.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025 · exclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Midwest
District · Development · Ownership 25.17%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
25.17%-held JV in the eastern Athabasca Basin operated by Orano Canada, hosting the Midwest Main and Midwest A deposits. The site is under care and maintenance within the Orano-operated McClean and Midwest CNSC licence. In August 2025 Denison reported a Preliminary Economic Assessment for the MWJV assessing ISR mining of the high-grade Midwest Main deposit, which the AIF describes as technically sound and economically robust with low initial capital costs, a high rate of return and rapid payback; the AIF does not publish the PEA's NPV, IRR, capital or operating cost figures. Planned 2026 work includes a feasibility-level SABRE assessment, environmental studies, an EA update and a CNSC licence amendment permitting receipt of Midwest ore. Neither published Midwest subtotal reconciles to its two deposit rows: indicated shows 50,700 klb against 49,500 klb summed and inferred 18,200 klb against 19,400 klb, an offsetting 1,200 klb suggesting a transposition in the source. Denison's grand totals agree with the deposit rows, not the subtotals; both are carried exactly as disclosed.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025 · exclusive
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Waterbury Lake
District · Development · Ownership 70.55%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
70.55%-held property in the eastern Athabasca Basin, held through the Waterbury Lake Uranium Limited Partnership with Korean partners, hosting the Tthe Heldeth Túé (THT, formerly J Zone) and Huskie deposits. A Preliminary Economic Assessment for the THT deposit with an effective date of October 30, 2020 supports the indicated resource. 2025 field activities included an evaluation drilling program and a hydrogeological drilling program. The property is covered by the 2025 Nuhenéné Benefit Agreement with YNLR and the Athabasca Communities. The AIF publishes an inferred subtotal for Waterbury covering only the Huskie deposit; THT's indicated resource is reported at the deposit level with no property subtotal.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Exploration · 5 projects
Huskie
Asset · Exploration · Ownership 70.55%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Inferred uranium resource on the Waterbury Lake property, estimated at a 0.10% U3O8 cut-off grade. It is the only deposit in the Waterbury inferred subtotal. 2025 activity on the property included an evaluation drilling program and a hydrogeological drilling program.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
McClean South
Asset · Exploration · Ownership 22.5%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Historical uranium estimates for the Southwest and Southeast Pods at McClean South on the McClean Lake property. The estimates do not comply with NI 43-101 and CIM definitions are not used; tonnages are reported in tons rather than tonnes. In July 2025 Denison and Orano Canada announced several significant new intercepts of shallow high-grade uranium mineralisation at the McClean South zone from a 6,400-metre drilling programme completed in the first half of 2025. Denison is not treating these as current mineral resources.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Christie Lake
Asset · Exploration · Ownership 17.2254%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Uranium project held indirectly through Denison's 50% ownership of JCU, which holds 34.4508%, giving Denison an effective 17.2254% interest; UEX is the operator. The inferred resource is supported by a technical report with an effective date of December 31, 2021 filed in March 2023 and was estimated at a 0.20% U3O8 cut-off grade.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Reserves & resources — detail
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Kiggavik
Asset · Exploration · Ownership 16.9059%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Non-Athabasca uranium project in Nunavut held indirectly through Denison's 50% ownership of JCU, which holds 33.8118%, giving Denison an effective 16.9059% interest; Orano Canada is the operator. The estimates are as reported by Orano SA in its 2023 Activities Report and converted for grades from %U to %U3O8 and for pounds from tonnes U to pounds U3O8; cut-off grades and the assumptions, parameters and methods used are unknown. Denison is not treating these as current mineral resources.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Millennium
Asset · Exploration · Ownership 15.0495%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Uranium project held indirectly through Denison's 50% ownership of JCU, which holds 30.0990%, giving Denison an effective 15.0495% interest; Cameco is the operator. The estimates are as reported by Cameco as of December 31, 2025; cut-off grades and the assumptions, parameters and methods used are unknown. A qualified person has not done sufficient work to verify or classify these as current mineral resources and Denison is not treating them as such, so they are carried here outside the reserve and resource categories.
Mining metrics
As at 31 December 2025
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Royalties & streams
All royalty and stream interests in the database that refer to this asset by name.
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Processing facilities · 1 project
McClean Lake Mill
Asset · Ownership 22.5%
Project information
As at 31 December 2025
Description
As at 31 December 2025
Uranium processing facility owned by the MLJV on the eastern edge of the Athabasca Basin about 750 km north of Saskatoon, operated and managed by Orano Canada. It is designed to process high-grade uranium ores using sulphuric acid and hydrogen peroxide leaching with solvent extraction recovery. Site infrastructure includes a sulphuric acid plant, ferric sulphate plant, oxygen plant, a transmission line tied to the provincial grid, a 14 MW back-up diesel plant and site accommodation. A 2016 expansion, paid for entirely by the CLJV, raised the CNSC-licensed annual production from 13.0 to 24.0 million pounds U3O8, enough to process all Cigar Lake output of up to 18.0 million pounds per year with flexibility for other feed. Ore milled was 55,073 in 2025, 58,226 in 2024, 51,866 in 2023, 54,301 in 2022 and 35,409 in 2021; the AIF's unit label for that line is inconsistent with the implied grades, so it is not carried as a row. Denison's 22.5% share of Cigar Lake toll milling proceeds above 215 Mlb U3O8 after July 1, 2016 was sold to Centaurus under the 2017 Ecora Transaction.
Processing facilities
Multiple effective dates
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Royalties & streams
All royalty and stream interests in the database that refer to this asset by name.
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
Assumptions
- The projects listed here reflect the information captured in this workspace and are not necessarily a complete picture of the company's portfolio. For authoritative figures, refer to the company's official filings.
Premium access required
This content is available on a paid plan.
Upgrade to Premium to unlock this content.
How to read this tab
- The tables below list unit codes most often used in the Energy Metals sector for this company. MetalPilot stores contained metal or product in the codes below; grade and tonnage use separate fields. In side-by-side comparison views (stock page Portfolio tab, watchlist By sector), heterogeneous source units are converted to each commodity's preferred display unit (for example Moz Au, kt Cu, MMbbl oil) before summing; the same canonical codes appear in project data.
What the Portfolio tab shows
- The Portfolio tab presents a project-level view of the company's reported assets, built from publicly disclosed information (technical reports, annual filings, MD&A, investor presentations, MRMR / R&R statements, NI 43-101 / NI 51-101 / SEC S-K 1300 / SEC S-K 1200 / JORC / SAMREC / PERC / PRMS / COGEH filings, and similar primary sources).
- Figures are grouped by project type (mining, oil & gas, royalty, stream, processing facility, development, portfolio aggregate) and are shown alongside the headline reserve base, headline production, headline grade / quality, cost benchmarks, estimated lifetime, commercial terms (for royalties / streams), operational capacity (for processing) and a single-figure rating where the underlying data supports one.
- Each data table on the Portfolio tab is followed by ONE Assumptions footnote describing the modelling choices for that table; KPI stat-card assumptions appear in the bottom block instead. All legal and section disclaimers are merged into a single disclaimer list at the bottom of the Portfolio tab.
Concepts in your sector — Energy metals (uranium)
- U₃O₈ vs U metal. Reserves are usually in lb or t U₃O₈; multiply by ~0.848 for U metal. Fuel-cycle contracts may quote kgU as UF₆ (schema: kgu).
- % U₃O₈ vs ppm U₃O₈. Athabasca grades can exceed 10%; ISR deposits often 0.05–0.5%. The schema preserves the source unit.
- ISR vs conventional. ISR tonnage is often m³ leach solution, not rock mass — cost structure differs from underground/open-pit.
Portfolio tab — table guide
- Portfolio KPIs — company-level headline numbers aggregated from the featured projects (project counts, attributable annual production by commodity, attributable resource base by commodity, last filing date, operator share). USD value lines multiply attributable volumes by the resolved snapshot price.
- Portfolio snapshot — one-screen summary of the portfolio: counts by type and status, country mix, reporting standards used, operator share, primary commodity, attributable annual production summary and attributable resource base summary.
- Mining — one row per mining project, with columns for project name, location, status, primary commodities, production (with rating), reserves & resources (with rating), grade (with rating), costs and estimated lifetime. Multi-commodity projects emit one summary row per commodity.
- Royalty — one row per royalty interest held by the company. Columns cover the underlying project, operator, commodity, commercial terms (rate, type, cap, area-of-interest), attributable production, attributable reserves and estimated lifetime.
- Stream — one row per metal stream held by the company. Each row shows the underlying project, the streamed commodity, the headline stream percentage, the ongoing per-ounce / per-tonne payment, and attributable production / reserves.
- Processing facilities — one row per midstream / processing facility (pipeline, fractionator, LNG train, storage cavern, refinery, smelter, mill, heap-leach pad, CPP, etc.). Columns include nameplate capacity, contracted capacity, feedstock commodities and operational footprint.
- Development — projects in development status or in a pre-production lifecycle phase. The production column is re-labelled 'Targeted production (rating)' to highlight that the figures are plans, not actuals.
- Portfolio Aggregate — a single company-level row used when the company itself publishes a portfolio rollup (e.g. company-wide 2P barrels across all properties).
- Reserves & resources — detail — a leaf-category pivot showing every reserve and resource category disclosed across the projects.
- NPV (grouped) — all NPV rows captured from the filings, grouped by commodity, resource category, development status and pricing case. Each NPV figure is shown with its discount rate, basis (before-tax / after-tax), currency and value scale.
Ownership / Working interest
- Ownership percentage means the company's working-interest share of the asset: its slice of the project before royalties and before government take. It is shown on a 0–100 scale.
- Mines, oil and gas fields, and processing facilities — this is how much of the asset belongs to the company under that working-interest idea. One hundred percent is fully owned; a lower number usually means partners share the rest.
- Royalties and streaming agreements — the percentage is often not the story; what matters economically is usually the royalty or stream rate, shown elsewhere alongside these figures.
- Oil and gas — read this as gross working interest only. Do not treat it as net production or net wells after royalties; when filings distinguish gross from net, that shows up in how the resource numbers themselves are labelled.
- Below 100% — the short summary for each project names other owners and their stakes when the source says who they are.
- NRI vs WI (O&G). Working interest (WI) is the obligation to pay a share of costs; net revenue interest (NRI) is the share of revenue after royalties and overriding-royalty interests. A 100% WI well rarely produces 100% NRI; typical onshore U.S. NRI is 75–87.5% of WI depending on the lease royalty.
- Operator vs non-operator. The operator runs day-to-day operations; non-operating partners pay their WI share of costs but do not run the asset. Some Portfolio rows show operator share where disclosed.
- Consolidation method — how the issuer accounts for the asset. Separate from how much the company owns (ownership %) and who operates it, this accounting treatment decides whether an asset's figures sit inside the company's reported group totals or are stripped out to a single net line. It applies to operating assets (mines, oil & gas fields, processing facilities) and is left blank for royalties, streams, and company-level portfolio rollups.
- Consolidated — the company controls the asset and includes 100% of its figures in the group total; the portion it does not own is carried as a non-controlling interest (NCI). Control is not the same as a majority, so a company can consolidate an asset it holds less than half of. Where ownership is below 100%, the Portfolio shows the NCI percentage (100 minus the company's stake).
- Proportionate — a jointly-operated asset the company includes at its own share, line by line; the share is inside the group total.
- Equity method — an associate or joint venture shown on a single net line, with its revenue excluded from the group total. This is the usual reason a company's reported total is smaller than the sum of its individual assets; the Portfolio flags the share of a commodity total that is equity-accounted.
- Cost / other — a passive or fair-value holding, excluded from the group total.
Unit codes, conversion cheat sheets, cost benchmarks (AISC, C1–C3), reporting standards (NI 43-101, JORC, SEC S-K 1300) and resource/reserve category definitions live in the full terminology & units reference.
Each table lists the numeric band for scores 1–5 (production and resource base; grade where applicable for mining commodities) using the same thresholds as project rating stat cards. Only commodities that appear on featured projects for this document are listed.
Uranium
Copper uses kt Cu bands; lb-scale copper resources are converted to kt. Lithium grade uses hard-rock % Li₂O bands unless brine-style extraction or brine units appear on featured projects.
Assumptions
- Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
This company
Commodity guides
Copyright © 2026, Metal Pilot
We use strictly necessary cookies for authentication and site functionality. Optional analytics (Google Analytics) load only after you accept; we do not use advertising, remarketing, or Google Signals. We honour Global Privacy Control (GPC) and other recognised opt-out signals by keeping analytics off for that browser.