Copper Africa Junior Producer
Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE): CPR

Copper 360 Ltd.

$38.6M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Copper 360 Ltd. is a junior copper producer headquartered in Nababeep, South Africa, operating primarily in Africa. The company's portfolio consists of 3 operating mines, in addition to several early-stage exploration prospects. Key assets include Rietberg. The business model integrates environmental clean-up with resource extraction by processing historically mined rock dumps alongside mining shallow resources. Operations are centered around a cluster model where multiple sites feed central processing facilities, enhancing efficiency and scalability. A significant competitive advantage is derived from an extensive proprietary geological database acquired from previous major operators, which has accelerated development past the exploration stage. The company has established multiple processing plants to handle different ore types, creating operational flexibility and reducing reliance on a single facility. To mitigate historical operational risks, the enterprise has invested in its own crushing capacity and a dedicated generator farm, ensuring energy security and consistent throughput, thereby de-risking production from external dependencies. This integrated approach, combining historical asset consolidation with modern processing and infrastructure independence, positions the organization for scalable growth.

Strategy

The corporate strategy is transitioning from a capital build phase to a production ramp-up, focusing on consolidating recent aggressive growth. Key priorities include integrating newly acquired assets, streamlining operations, and optimizing financial management to enhance cash flow and manage debt effectively. A strategic shift to underground extraction is underway to increase production capacity, improve cost efficiencies, and reduce reliance on surface-level material. Management is targeting a balanced product mix, with an eventual focus on concentrate sales comprising over 80% of total output to maximize revenue. Capital allocation has been dynamic, demonstrated by the redeployment of funds from a plant construction project to an opportunistic acquisition that provided immediate processing capacity. A significant equity facility has been secured to fund future capital growth if required. The long-term outlook includes establishing smelting capabilities, diversifying into related sectors like agriculture and renewable energy, and initiating dividend distributions.

Management

The board of directors consists of 9 members, comprising 5 executive directors and 4 non-executive directors, of whom 2 are designated as independent. Governance is structured through 5 board committees: Audit and Risk; Social, Ethics and Nominations; Remuneration; Strategy; and Operations. Executive leadership brings extensive, practical industry experience. The Chief Executive Officer is a geologist with over 28 years of experience, noted for building junior companies into significant enterprises. The Executive Chairperson is an entrepreneur with 32 years of practical experience in building and running extractive businesses. The Chief Operating Officer is an engineering executive with 30 years of international operational experience, while the Chief Financial Officer is a chartered accountant with 33 years of experience in corporate advisory and mergers and acquisitions within the mining sector. The board has formally delegated roles to its committees, each with specific terms of reference, and has satisfied itself that key management functions are led by competent individuals. An external law firm serves as the company secretary, maintaining an arm's-length relationship.

Sustainability

The organization demonstrates a strong commitment to gender diversity, with women comprising 50% of the total workforce, 30% of top management, and 22% of the board. A key community initiative is the establishment of a School of Mining, which has provided skills development courses to over 400 local participants, enhancing their employment prospects. This program is situated within the community and leverages company employees as instructors. The business model inherently includes environmental stewardship by processing and rehabilitating historically impacted sites, an effort recognized with responsible resourcing awards. To further this commitment, the company is actively pursuing renewable energy solutions. A dedicated health and safety department reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer, overseeing comprehensive induction programs and safety protocols. An executive-level Community Liaison role, supported by a team of officers, manages community engagement. The Social and Ethics Committee provides board-level oversight on matters including social and economic development, corporate citizenship, and environmental compliance.

Structure

The current corporate structure was formed through a reverse takeover by Shirley Hayes-IPK (Pty) Ltd (SHiP), of which the company now owns 95%. This transaction consolidated control over a significant mining right. During the reporting period, the group executed a strategic acquisition of Nama Copper for its operational processing plant and associated resources. Another key acquisition was the purchase of O'Okiep Copper Company (OCC), which holds essential operating licenses and permits. The group's operational assets are held within distinct subsidiaries. SHiP holds the primary mining right, while Cape Copper Oxide (Pty) Ltd (CCO) operates processing facilities and manages historical rock dumps, with OCC being its wholly-owned subsidiary. This structure separates the mining activities under the mining right from the processing of historical surface assets.

Source

Copper 360 Limited - Integrated Annual Report - 2024

Rietberg
90.00%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ Northern Cape, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 1000 Mlb Cu (very low)
Average Grade 1 - 1.5 % (medium)
Homeep-East
90.00%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ Northern Cape, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 1000 Mlb Cu (very low)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Jubilee
90.00%
πŸ‡ΏπŸ‡¦ Northern Cape, South Africa
operating, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 1000 Mlb Cu (very low)
Average Grade 1 - 1.5 % (medium)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

Β©