Copper Australia Junior Developer
Australian Securities Exchange (ASX): CVV

Caravel Minerals Ltd.

$56.3M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Caravel Minerals Ltd. is a junior copper development company headquartered in Subiaco, Australia, operating primarily in Australia. The company's portfolio consists of 1 development project. Key assets include Caravel. The business model centers on advancing a large-scale, long-life development asset from exploration to production. The operational approach is designed around conventional open-pit, low-cost bulk mining methods, incorporating automated and electrified equipment to enhance efficiency and reduce environmental impact. Processing capabilities will utilize an industry-proven conventional plant to produce a high-quality concentrate product, with by-products expected to provide material revenue credits at no additional production cost. The company's competitive position is derived from the asset's significant scale, extended operational life, and strong underlying economics, which are designed to generate attractive margins throughout commodity price cycles. This positions the organization at the forefront of a new generation of global development assets required to meet future structural market deficits. The development strategy focuses on systematic de-risking through comprehensive engineering studies and securing necessary permits and infrastructure access in a Tier-1 jurisdiction, ensuring a clear pathway to production.

Strategy

Strategic priorities center on the systematic de-risking and advancement of a singular, large-scale development asset through a Definitive Feasibility Study. Near-term objectives involve finalizing an updated mine plan to increase value, optimizing process and tailings design, and delivering a simplified site layout to reduce capital and operating costs. A critical component of the strategy is progressing environmental approvals and securing water and power access, including pursuing 'Critical Project Status' to fast-track infrastructure connections. The capital allocation philosophy is characterized by a prudent and responsible management of cash reserves, focusing on targeted studies and critical path activities such as permitting and land access negotiations. The organization is concurrently progressing discussions with potential strategic investors, off-takers, and project development partners, including export credit agencies, to secure financing and operational expertise for the development phase. The ultimate goal is to establish a new, significant producer to meet surging long-term global demand driven by global decarbonization trends.

Management

Executive leadership is spearheaded by a Managing Director with over 30 years of international experience in mineral resource project development, including senior roles at Fortescue Metals Group and Rio Tinto. The board includes an Executive Director with 35 years of industry experience and a track record of successful project development, and a Non-Executive Chairman with 35 years of expertise in mining, electricity, and construction. Governance is further enhanced by the appointment of a Strategic Advisor with over 30 years of international experience, recognized for a pioneering role in implementing next-generation technologies like autonomous haulage. The board of directors, which held 9 meetings during the fiscal year, provides strategic oversight. A dedicated Remuneration Committee, which met twice, guides compensation policies. This leadership structure combines extensive operational, project development, and technological expertise to guide the organization's transition from exploration into development and operations.

Sustainability

The sustainability framework is aligned with internationally recognized standards, including The Equator Principles and Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards, to support project financing and ensure transparent disclosure. A core environmental strategy involves designing the operational footprint on mostly cleared, freehold agricultural land to preserve the majority of high-value remnant native vegetation. The organization submitted a comprehensive Environmental Review Document to regulatory authorities, representing the culmination of 4 years of extensive fieldwork, scientific modeling, and impact studies. A key social initiative focuses on forming partnerships with local landholders to rehabilitate degraded land affected by rising groundwater and surface salinity. The company maintains active engagement with Traditional Owners, conducting heritage surveys and pursuing partnership opportunities. A commitment to decarbonization is demonstrated through plans to connect to the state electrical grid, which has considerable renewable energy generation, supporting the marketing of a low-carbon-intensity product.

Structure

The corporate structure is centered on the 100% ownership of its primary development asset. To support its advancement, the organization is actively engaging with potential strategic and financial partners. A key development in this area was receiving a Letter of Interest from the Export and Investment Fund of Denmark (EIFO), the Danish Export Credit Agency, confirming interest in providing equipment and project finance, contingent on the procurement of technology from Danish suppliers. The company has also secured a binding call option deed with landowner Lawson Grains Pty Ltd to acquire 1,098 hectares of freehold land covering planned initial mining areas, providing certainty for the development pathway. In 2023, the company completed a successful $10 million capital raising through an institutional share placement and a Share Purchase Plan to fund ongoing feasibility studies and permitting activities. Substantial shareholders include key executives and institutional investors such as Paradice Investment Management.

Source

Caravel Minerals - Annual Report - 2024

Caravel
100.00%
🇦🇺 Western Australia, Australia
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 4000 - 10000 Mlb Cu (medium)
Average Grade < 0.5 % (very low)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 25 - 75 moz ag (low)
Average Grade < 50 g/t ag (very low)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©