Berkeley Energia Ltd.
Overview
Berkeley Energia Ltd. is a junior uranium development company headquartered in Perth, Australia, operating primarily in Europe. The company's portfolio consists of 1 development project. Key assets include Salamanca. The organization's business model is centered on the development of a large-scale, clean energy asset. A 2016 definitive feasibility study indicated the potential for the project to be among the world's lowest-cost producers, capable of generating strong cash flows. However, the primary operational characteristic is currently defined by a significant legal and permitting dispute with a sovereign state. This impasse has led the company to initiate international arbitration proceedings to protect its investments. In parallel, the enterprise is actively pursuing diversification through an exploration initiative focused on battery and critical metals, including lithium, cobalt, tin, and tungsten. This exploration is conducted within the company's existing tenements and involves geological mapping, soil sampling, and drilling programs to define new anomalies and assess their economic potential. This dual focus on legal recourse for its main asset and exploration for strategic minerals represents a risk-mitigation and value-creation approach in a complex regulatory environment. The company's activities are therefore characterized by high-stakes legal proceedings combined with early-stage exploration for commodities critical to the energy transition.
Strategy
The core strategic objective is the defense and enforcement of the company's investment rights through international arbitration. This legal strategy, initiated in 2024, seeks preliminary compensation in the order of US$1 billion for alleged breaches of the Energy Charter Treaty by a sovereign state, following the rejection of a key construction permit in 2021. While pursuing this legal recourse, the organization remains open to constructive dialogue with the relevant authorities to find an amicable resolution. A parallel strategy involves assessing new business and development opportunities within the broader resources sector to build shareholder value. This includes advancing a solar power system project, for which a study has been finalized and an application submitted. Furthermore, a significant exploration initiative is underway to identify and develop resources of battery and critical metals. This program is designed to leverage existing tenements and includes multi-phase drilling campaigns to test defined tin-lithium anomalies. This multifaceted strategy aims to unlock the value of its primary asset through legal channels while simultaneously creating new growth options through diversification into other critical materials and renewable energy.
Management
Executive leadership features seasoned industry professionals with extensive corporate and technical experience. The Chairman is a Chartered Accountant with a background as a senior group executive for a major mining group and currently serves as a director for numerous publicly listed resource companies. The Acting Managing Director is a geologist with over 30 years of experience in mineral exploration and mining, recognized for his instrumental role in the growth and subsequent billion-dollar acquisition of an African-focused development company. A Non-Executive Director contributes nearly 3 decades of institutional fund management experience, having co-founded a successful investment boutique in London. The board of directors, currently comprising 3 members, takes a direct oversight role, performing the functions of an Audit Committee and a Risk Committee. A separate Remuneration and Nomination Committee, consisting of 2 directors, is responsible for determining executive remuneration and overseeing incentive plans. This governance structure reflects a lean, hands-on approach suited to the company's current focus on legal strategy and exploration.
Sustainability
The company's commitment to sustainability is formalized through its certification in accordance with ISO 14001 for Environmental Management and UNE 22470/80 for Sustainable Mining Management. These systems provide a framework for the systematic monitoring and continuous improvement of sustainability indicators. An independent audit of these management systems during the year confirmed compliance and noted ongoing enhancements to climate change and sustainability processes. A key initiative demonstrating this commitment is the development of a solar power system at its project site; a detailed study for this system has been finalized and a formal application has been submitted to the relevant authorities. This project is aligned with the organization's goal of promoting environmental sustainability and generating a positive impact. The enterprise also publishes an annual Sustainability Report to maintain transparency and track progress against its sustainability goals, which are reviewed and updated for each reporting period.
Structure
The corporate structure consists of a parent entity with wholly owned operational subsidiaries, including Berkeley Exploration Ltd, Berkeley Minera España, S.L.U., and Exploración de Recursos Minerales, S.L.U. In a significant structural action, the subsidiary Berkeley Exploration Ltd filed a Request for Arbitration in 2024 against a sovereign state before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) to enforce its investment rights. This proceeding is central to the company's current activities. The ownership base is highly concentrated, with nominee and custody entities holding a significant portion of the equity. One nominee entity, BNP Paribas Nominees Pty Ltd, holds a controlling interest of 56.53% on behalf of underlying beneficial owners. Other major holders include HSBC Custody Nominees (12.07%), Computershare Clearing (11.84%), and another BNP Paribas entity (6.59%). The company has also received substantial shareholder notices from Paradice Investment Management Pty Ltd and Packer & Co Ltd, indicating a notable presence of institutional and private trust investors.
Source
Berkeley Energia Limited - Annual Report - 2024
- Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
- The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
- Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
- Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
- Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
- Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
- Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
- Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
- Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
- Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
- koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
- moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
- g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
- usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
- moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
- g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
- usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
- kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
- mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
- %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
- usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
- mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
- % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
- usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
- Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
- Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
- ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
- Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
- Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
- Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
- Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
- Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
- P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
- M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
- Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
- Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
- PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
- Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
- Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
- BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
- NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
- IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
- Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
- AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
- Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
- Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
- NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
- GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
- NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery