Uranium Africa Europe Junior Developer
Australian Securities Exchange (ASX): AEE

Aura Energy Ltd.

$91.9M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Aura Energy Ltd. is a junior uranium development company headquartered in Melbourne, Australia, operating primarily in Africa and Europe. The company's portfolio consists of 3 projects, comprising 1 development and 2 advanced exploration projects. Key assets include Tiris and Häggån. The business model centers on advancing assets with distinct operational and processing advantages. One development asset features shallow, free-dig mineralization within unconsolidated material, eliminating the need for drilling, blasting, crushing, or grinding. Its processing flowsheet involves simple scrubbing and screening to produce a high-grade concentrate for a small-scale alkaline leach plant, a method proven at other industrial operations. This approach facilitates a low-cost, high-margin operational profile with a simplified logistical chain. A second, large-scale asset is characterized by its polymetallic nature, offering strategic optionality in producing a range of materials to support clean energy applications. The company's competitive positioning is enhanced by a dual-asset strategy, balancing a near-term, low-capital development project with a long-term, large-scale resource that provides significant unrealized value and diversification.

Strategy

Strategic priorities center on advancing a near-term development asset to a final investment decision by early 2025, with a target for initial production in late 2026. This involves finalizing a comprehensive funding package through a dual-track process managed by appointed advisors, engaging both debt financiers and potential strategic equity partners. A key objective is the cost-effective expansion of the resource base, with a demonstrated discovery cost of only US$0.14 per lb, to support future production scalability. For its large-scale polymetallic asset, the strategic approach involves securing necessary permits and navigating evolving legislative frameworks to unlock its value, which has been demonstrated to be robust even without the inclusion of certain contained commodities. The organization also focuses on de-risking its projects through advanced engineering studies, securing key operational permits, and strengthening its development team with experienced personnel.

Management

Executive leadership was strengthened with the appointment of a new Managing Director and CEO on 30 January 2024, who brings over 30 years of experience in financing, developing, and operating projects, including the successful acquisition of Chesser Resources. The board of directors consists of a Non-Executive Chairman and 4 other directors, including the CEO. Governance is managed through an Audit and Risk Committee and a Remuneration and Nomination Committee. In response to a 'first strike' on the 2023 remuneration report, the Remuneration and Nomination Committee engaged an independent advisor to develop a revised Long-Term Incentive Plan to better align executive compensation with shareholder returns. This new framework, which utilizes nil-cost share options with a 3-year cliff vesting period and performance hurdles, will be implemented in fiscal year 2025. The board increased its oversight during the year through its committees, which conducted a comprehensive risk review and engaged regularly with the auditor.

Sustainability

The organization's sustainability framework is guided by a purpose statement focused on developing materials for a cleaner energy world while creating value for host nations and local communities. Key environmental initiatives include incorporating renewable energy generation into project designs to support emissions reduction and confirming in-pit disposal for waste and process residue to minimize the operational footprint. Social responsibility is demonstrated through active stakeholder engagement, including financial support for the Tiris Zemmour Cultural Week and ongoing consultations with local communities and Sami villages to incorporate feedback into project planning. The company has established a set of ESG-related values covering business integrity, health and safety, diversity, environmental stewardship, and social responsibility. Management plans for environmental, social, and radiation aspects are under review to align with updated production targets.

Structure

The corporate structure includes an 85% ownership interest in its primary development asset, with the remaining 15% held by a government entity. Its secondary large-scale asset is held through a 100% owned subsidiary, Vanadis Battery Metals AB. During 2024, the company restructured a key offtake agreement with Curzon Uranium Ltd, which resulted in a 70% increase in the fixed contract price for a portion of future production. As part of the restructure, Curzon became a substantial shareholder through a US$3.5 million equity placement and the receipt of a US$3.5 million restructuring fee paid in company shares, creating strong alignment between the two parties. On 28 June 2024, the parent entity entered into a deed of cross guarantee with 4 of its wholly-owned Australian subsidiaries: Archaean Greenstone Gold Limited, Aura Energy Mauritania Pty Ltd, Tiris Zemmour Resources Pty Ltd, and North East Resources Pty Ltd.

Source

Aura Energy Limited - Annual Report - 2024

Tiris
85.00%
🇲🇷 Mauritania
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 80 - 150 mlb U3O8 (high)
Average Grade < 0.05 % eU3O8 (very low)
Häggån
100.00%
🇸🇪 Jämtland, Sweden
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 150 mlb U3O8 (very high)
Average Grade < 0.05 % eU3O8 (very low)
Tasiast South
100.00%
🇲🇷 Mauritania
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©