Copper PGM Africa Senior Producer
London Stock Exchange (LSE): AAL OTCQX (OTC): AAUKF

Anglo American Plc

$31.7B
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Anglo American Plc is a senior copper and pgm producer headquartered in London, United Kingdom, operating primarily in Africa. The company's portfolio consists of 42 projects, comprising 27 operating mines, 5 development, 7 advanced exploration, and 3 suspended projects. Key assets include Collahuasi, Mogalakwena, Orapa, Quellaveco, and Mototolo. The business model is centered on an integrated value chain, from discovery and planning to processing and marketing, designed to unlock value from mineral resources. A core operational characteristic is the application of the proprietary Operating Model, a standardized framework for target setting, planning, execution, and continuous improvement to drive efficiency and safety. The organization leverages advanced technologies to reduce its physical footprint, aiming for lower energy and water consumption per tonne of material produced. A key differentiator is the customer-centric Marketing business, which provides tailored product solutions, logistics, and market insights, supported by responsible sourcing assurance through third-party audits and digital traceability platforms like Valutraxâ„¢. This integrated approach, combining operational discipline with market intelligence and technological innovation, underpins the company's competitive positioning and its strategy to connect resources to end-users.

Strategy

Strategic priorities are focused on operational excellence, portfolio simplification, and value-accretive growth. The company is executing a significant portfolio transformation to create a simpler, higher-margin business concentrated on products that support global trends in decarbonization, rising living standards, and food security. Capital allocation is governed by a disciplined framework that prioritizes sustaining capital for asset integrity, followed by a base dividend based on a 40% payout of underlying earnings. Discretionary capital is then directed toward high-return growth projects or additional shareholder returns. This strategy is supported by key enablers, including advanced sustainability and technical competencies, a strong reputation, a purpose-led culture, and a sophisticated marketing function that provides customer solutions. The long-term objective is to build a resilient and agile business positioned to generate strong cash flow and deliver sustainable returns through the economic cycle.

Management

Board composition includes 11 directors, comprising a chair, 2 executive directors, and 8 independent non-executive directors, ensuring a majority of independent oversight. Governance is structured through 4 primary committees: Audit, Nomination, Remuneration, and Sustainability. Executive leadership is spearheaded by a Chief Executive with over 30 years of international mining experience and a Finance Director with proven strategic and commercial expertise. A distinctive governance feature is the Global Workforce Advisory Panel, chaired by a non-executive director, which provides a direct channel for employee perspectives to be considered in boardroom discussions, enhancing stakeholder engagement. The Board conducts an annual externally-facilitated effectiveness review to ensure its composition and processes remain robust and aligned with strategic objectives. This structure supports rigorous oversight of strategy, risk management, and succession planning for senior leadership.

Sustainability

The sustainability approach is embedded in the 'FutureSmart Miningâ„¢' program, which integrates innovation and technology to improve environmental and social outcomes. This is guided by the Sustainable Mining Plan, built on 3 pillars: a Healthy Environment, Thriving Communities, and being a Trusted Corporate Leader. The company has committed to ambitious, long-term targets, including achieving carbon neutrality for Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 2040, with a 30% reduction by 2030, and a 50% reduction in Scope 3 emissions by 2040. Environmental stewardship goals include delivering a net-positive impact on biodiversity and reducing absolute freshwater withdrawals in water-scarce regions by 50% by 2030. A key initiative is the Envusa Energy partnership with EDF Renewables, established to develop a regional renewable energy ecosystem. The organization also pilots advanced monitoring techniques, such as the TNFD's LEAP approach and environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling, to enhance its nature-related risk management and reporting.

Structure

The company is undergoing a significant portfolio restructuring to simplify its corporate structure. This includes a definitive agreement to sell its steelmaking coal business to Peabody Energy and a separate sale of its interest in Jellinbah to Zashvin. An agreement was also reached to sell its nickel business to MMG, with completion expected in 2025. The demerger of Anglo American Platinum is planned for mid-2025, which will establish it as a stand-alone entity. A dual-track process is under way for the separation of De Beers. In 2024, the company completed a transaction with Vale SA to integrate the Serpentina resource, whereby Vale acquired a 15% shareholding in the enlarged operation. The organization maintains significant joint operations, including a 50:50 partnership with the Government of the Republic of Botswana in Debswana. A 50:50 joint venture, Envusa Energy, was formed with EDF Renewables to develop renewable energy projects.

Source

Anglo American - Integrated Annual Report - 2024

Collahuasi
44.00%
🇨🇱 Chile
operating, open pit
Annual production: 500 - 1000 Mlb Cu (high)
Resource base: > 20000 Mlb Cu (very high)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: 5 - 15 Mlbs Mo (low)
Resource base: > 1000 Mlbs Mo (very high)
Average Grade 0.03 - 0.06 % Mo (low)
Mogalakwena
66.70%
🇿🇦 South Africa
operating, open pit
Annual production: 0.7 - 1.5 Moz 4E PGM (medium)
Resource base: > 100 Moz 4E PGM (very high)
Average Grade 1.5 - 3 g/t 4E PGM (low)
Orapa
42.50%
🇧🇼 Botswana
operating, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Quellaveco
60.00%
🇵🇪 Peru
operating, open pit
Annual production: 250 - 500 Mlb Cu (medium)
Resource base: > 20000 Mlb Cu (very high)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: 5 - 15 Mlbs Mo (low)
Resource base: > 1000 Mlbs Mo (very high)
Average Grade 0.03 - 0.06 % Mo (low)
Mototolo
66.70%
🇿🇦 Limpopo, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: 1.5 - 3 Moz 4E PGM (high)
Resource base: 50 - 100 Moz 4E PGM (high)
Average Grade 3 - 5 g/t 4E PGM (medium)
Atlantic 1
42.50%
🇳🇦 Offshore, Namibia
operating
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Jwaneng
42.50%
🇧🇼 Botswana
operating, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Los Bronces
50.10%
🇨🇱 Chile
operating, open pit and underground
Annual production: 250 - 500 Mlb Cu (medium)
Resource base: > 20000 Mlb Cu (very high)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: 5 - 15 Mlbs Mo (low)
Resource base: > 1000 Mlbs Mo (very high)
Average Grade 0.03 - 0.06 % Mo (low)
Serra Do Sapo
85.00%
🇧🇷 Brazil
operating, open pit
Annual production: 30 - 75 Mt Fe Ore (medium)
Resource base: > 5000 mt ore (very high)
Average Grade 25 - 40 % Fe (low)
Venetia
62.90%
🇿🇦 South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Amandelbult
66.70%
🇿🇦 South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: 0.2 - 0.7 Moz 4E PGM (low)
Resource base: 50 - 100 Moz 4E PGM (high)
Average Grade 5 - 8 g/t 4E PGM (high)
Barro Alto
100.00%
🇧🇷 Brazil
operating, open pit
Annual production: 25 - 50 kt ni (medium)
Resource base: 700 - 1500 kt Ni (high)
Average Grade 0.6 - 1.2 % Ni (low)
Dawson
51.00%
🇦🇺 Australia
operating, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Gahcho Kué
43.40%
🇨🇦 Northwest Territories, Canada
operating, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Hotazel Manganese Mines
29.60%
🇿🇦 Northern Cape, South Africa
operating, open pit and underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Modikwa
33.40%
🇿🇦 Limpopo, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: 0.7 - 1.5 Moz 4E PGM (medium)
Resource base: 50 - 100 Moz 4E PGM (high)
Average Grade 3 - 5 g/t 4E PGM (medium)
Capcoal
77.30%
🇦🇺 Australia
operating, open pit and underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Gemco
40.00%
🇦🇺 Groote Eylandt, Australia
operating, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Moranbah North
88.00%
🇦🇺 Australia
operating, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Sishen
52.50%
🇿🇦 Northern Cape, South Africa
operating, open pit
Annual production: 10 - 30 Mt Fe Ore (low)
Resource base: 500 - 2000 mt ore (medium)
Average Grade 40 - 55 % Fe (medium)
Unki
66.70%
🇿🇼 Selukwe, Zimbabwe
operating, underground
Annual production: 0.7 - 1.5 Moz 4E PGM (medium)
Resource base: 20 - 50 Moz 4E PGM (medium)
Average Grade 3 - 5 g/t 4E PGM (medium)
El Soldado
50.10%
🇨🇱 Chile
operating, open pit
Annual production: < 100 Mlb Cu (very low)
Resource base: 1000 - 4000 Mlb Cu (low)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Annual production: 5 - 15 Mlbs Mo (low)
Resource base: 50 - 200 Mlbs Mo (low)
Average Grade 0.03 - 0.06 % Mo (low)
Kolomela
52.50%
🇿🇦 Northern Cape, South Africa
operating, open pit
Annual production: < 10 Mt Fe Ore (very low)
Resource base: 100 - 500 mt ore (low)
Average Grade > 60 % Fe (very high)
Niquelândia
100.00%
🇧🇷 Goiás, Brazil
operating, open pit
Annual production: < 10 kt ni (very low)
Resource base: 100 - 300 kt Ni (low)
Average Grade 0.6 - 1.2 % Ni (low)
Mamatwan
29.60%
🇿🇦 Northern Cape, South Africa
operating, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Namdeb
42.50%
🇳🇦 Namibia
operating, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Wessels
29.60%
🇿🇦 Northern Cape, South Africa
operating, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Damtshaa
42.50%
🇧🇼 Botswana, Botswana
suspended, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Grosvenor
88.00%
🇦🇺 Queensland, Australia
suspended, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Peace River Coal
100.00%
🇨🇦 British Columbia, Canada
suspended, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Jacaré
100.00%
🇧🇷 Pará, Brazil
development, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 1500 kt Ni (very high)
Average Grade 0.6 - 1.2 % Ni (low)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 150 - 300 kt Co (high)
Average Grade 0.15 - 0.3 % Co (medium)
Los Bronces Underground
50.10%
🇨🇱 Metropolitan, Chile
development, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 20000 Mlb Cu (very high)
Average Grade 1 - 1.5 % (medium)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 1000 Mlbs Mo (very high)
Average Grade 0.03 - 0.06 % Mo (low)
Twickenham
66.70%
🇿🇦 Limpopo, South Africa
development, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 100 Moz 4E PGM (very high)
Average Grade 5 - 8 g/t 4E PGM (high)
Woodsmith
100.00%
🇬🇧 UK
development, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Sakatti
100.00%
🇫🇮 Lapland, Finland
development, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 1000 - 4000 Mlb Cu (low)
Average Grade 1.5 - 2 % (high)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 300 - 700 kt Ni (medium)
Average Grade 1.8 - 2.5 % Ni (high)
Los Bronces Sur
50.10%
🇨🇱 Chile, Chile
exploration, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 20000 Mlb Cu (very high)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
West Wall
50.00%
🇨🇱 Chile, Chile
exploration, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: > 20000 Mlb Cu (very high)
Average Grade 0.5 - 1 % (low)
Moranbah South
50.00%
🇦🇺 Queensland, Australia
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Theodore
51.00%
🇦🇺 Queensland, Australia
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Belcourt Saxon
100.00%
🇨🇦 British Columbia, Canada
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Chidliak
85.00%
🇨🇦 Nunavut, Canada
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Itapanhoacanga
95.10%
🇧🇷 Brazil, Brazil
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 100 - 500 mt ore (low)
Average Grade 40 - 55 % Fe (medium)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©