Silver Mexico Junior Producer
Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX): USA NYSE ARCA (ARCA): USAS

Americas Gold & Silver Corp.

$627.6M
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Americas Gold & Silver Corp. is a junior silver producer headquartered in Toronto, Canada, operating primarily in Mexico. The company's portfolio consists of 4 projects, comprising 2 operating mines, 1 advanced exploration, and 1 suspended project. Key assets include Galena Complex and Cosalá. The entity is a producer focused on precious and polymetallic mineral properties, particularly those already in production or with near-term potential. Its business model involves evaluation, acquisition, exploration, development, and operation. The company operates multiple processing facilities, including one with a capacity of 680 tonnes-per-day and another processing approximately 1,700 tonnes-per-day, producing various concentrates. A third plant with a 450 tonnes-per-day capacity is on care and maintenance. Mining techniques include selective methods such as cut and fill, suited for narrow-vein deposits. The organization believes it has flexibility in concentrate sales due to alternate processing and commercialization options, mitigating dependency on single purchasers. The business is subject to the cyclical nature of the minerals industry and competes with other mining companies for acquisitions, development projects, and qualified personnel.

Strategy

Strategic focus centers on increasing production and lowering operating costs at a key operational complex, supported by a recent C$50 million financing and a consolidation transaction. A core objective is the development of a new project, with a timeline to reach full production by the end of 2025, funded in part by a secured credit facility. The enterprise is pursuing operational improvements through technical reviews, optimization work, and a metallurgical sampling program aimed at enhancing by-product recovery and revenue. Resource base expansion is a key priority, driven by exploration and drilling programs designed to discover new high-grade veins, explore under-explored areas, and systematically replace mined-out reserves. Capital allocation is directed towards funding these development and exploration initiatives to unlock value and position the company as a focused producer. The strategy also includes preparing new production guidance for 2025.

Management

Executive leadership is headed by a Chief Executive Officer appointed in November 2024, who also serves as Chairman of the Board. This individual has a background as CEO of Karora Resources and Klondex Mines and has a stated focus on assembling an experienced technical team to enhance asset value. The Board of Directors oversees the company through 3 standing committees: Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance, and Sustainability & Technical. The Audit Committee is composed of 3 independent directors, all of whom are financially literate, and is responsible for auditor oversight and financial reporting integrity. The governance framework includes a detailed Audit Committee Charter outlining procedures for auditor engagement, financial statement review, and handling of complaints. Management structure also includes a Chief Operating Officer with over 35 years of experience, noted for driving significant growth at Karora and Klondex.

Sustainability

The organization's sustainability program is formalized through public reporting, with its first report issued in March 2021 and a second in June 2022. A comprehensive report covering the period from 2022 to 2025 is currently in preparation under the direction of a Vice President of Sustainability and Communications. The corporate responsibility strategy is built on 5 key pillars: governance and business ethics, its people, health and safety, environmental stewardship, and community involvement. The company affirms its commitment to responsible mining that contributes to community growth through employment and local procurement. Environmental management includes compliance with regulations for water quality, air quality, and waste management, with proactive engagement with citizens and regulators to address concerns. The entity is focused on strengthening monitoring, controls, and disclosure of environmental issues affecting employees and surrounding communities.

Structure

The current corporate entity was formed through a series of transactions, including a 2014 merger between Scorpio Mining Corporation and U.S. Silver & Gold Inc., and the 2019 acquisition of Pershing Gold Corporation. In December 2024, the company completed the acquisition of the remaining 40% non-controlling interest in its Galena Complex from Eric Sprott, a transaction that consolidated its ownership. This deal involved the issuance of 170,000,000 common shares, a cash payment, and a commitment for future metal deliveries. A significant financing and offtake agreement was established with Trafigura PTE Ltd. in August 2024, providing a secured credit facility for the development of the EC120 Project in exchange for 100% of that project's future silver-copper concentrate production. As a result of the consolidation transaction, Eric Sprott holds approximately 20% of the company's outstanding common shares. Key operating subsidiaries include U.S. Silver Idaho Inc., Minera Cosalá S.A. de C.V., and Pershing Gold Corporation.

Source

Americas Gold And Silver Corporation - Annual Information Form - 2024

Galena Complex
100.00%
🇺🇸 Idaho, USA
operating, underground
Annual production: 1 - 3 moz ag (low)
Resource base: 75 - 150 moz ag (medium)
Average Grade > 300 g/t ag (very high)
Annual production: < 25 kt Pb (very low)
Resource base: 1.5 - 4 Mt Pb (medium)
Average Grade 5 - 8 % Pb (high)
Cosalá
100.00%
🇲🇽 Sinaloa, Mexico
operating, underground
Annual production: < 1 moz ag (very low)
Resource base: < 25 moz ag (very low)
Average Grade 50 - 100 g/t ag (low)
Annual production: < 50 kt Zn (very low)
Resource base: 1 - 3 Mt Zn (low)
Average Grade 5 - 8 % Zn (medium)
Relief Canyon
100.00%
🇺🇸 Nevada, USA
suspended, open pit
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 1 moz au (very low)
Average Grade < 1 g/t (very low)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 25 moz ag (very low)
Average Grade < 50 g/t ag (very low)
San Felipe
100.00%
🇲🇽 Sonora, Mexico
exploration, underground
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 1 - 3 Mt Zn (low)
Average Grade 5 - 8 % Zn (medium)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: < 25 moz ag (very low)
Average Grade < 50 g/t ag (very low)
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©