Silver Europe Junior Producer
London Stock Exchange (LSE): ADT1 Australian Securities Exchange (ASX): ADT

Adriatic Metals Plc

$1.4B
Last updated: 08/17/2025

Overview

Adriatic Metals Plc is a junior silver producer headquartered in London, United Kingdom, operating primarily in Europe. The company's portfolio consists of 2 projects, comprising 1 operating mine and 1 advanced exploration project. Key assets include Vareš Silver. The business model centers on producing and delivering metal concentrates to smelters, supported by an integrated approach that combines ongoing production with continued exploration across its concession package. A key operational characteristic is the transition to an owner-operator model, which enhances control over mining activities and safety protocols. The development cycle is systematic, progressing from asset targeting and exploration to construction, production, and eventual restoration, emphasizing a long-term operational perspective. Competitive positioning is driven by the processing of high-grade source material, which is intended to yield premium products and lower processing costs. The company's structure as a revenue-generating entity that evolved from an exploration and development stage provides a foundation for scalable and sustainable operations. This model is designed to deliver consistent products to customers while managing the full lifecycle of its mineral resources responsibly.

Strategy

Strategic priorities are structured around 3 core pillars: near-term cash generation, organic growth, and external growth opportunities. The immediate focus is on achieving a 1st quartile cost curve position and generating significant free cash flow through consistent operational performance. Organic growth initiatives center on accelerating the definition of brownfield exploration upside and delivering on greenfield targets within existing concessions. For external growth, the strategy involves targeting value-accretive polymetallic assets and projects with potential for a sustainable footprint. Capital allocation is disciplined to maximize shareholder returns, with a stated priority on debt repayment as operations ramp up. Execution is measured against a detailed 2025 Key Performance Indicator framework heavily weighted toward operational discipline (50%), which includes production, cost, and capital effectiveness, complemented by sustainability (30%) and people (20%) metrics. The organization is also advancing expansion studies to potentially increase production capacity.

Management

Executive leadership is headed by CEO Laura Tyler, appointed in 2024, who brings over 30 years of industry experience, including a 20-year career at BHP where she served as the inaugural Chief Technical Officer. The Board of Directors is composed of 7 members, including 5 independent directors, ensuring a majority of independent oversight. Governance framework adheres to the Quoted Companies Alliance (QCA) Corporate Governance Code and is supported by 3 primary committees: Audit & Risk, Sustainability, and Remuneration & Nomination. A key governance enhancement in 2024 was the appointment of the company's first Senior Independent Director to act as a sounding board for the Chair. An internal board performance effectiveness review conducted in December 2024 resulted in specific action plans, including enhancing the stakeholder management plan, improving the functionality of the Employee Council, and increasing the focus on internal audit capabilities. The leadership philosophy prioritizes health and safety, responsible stewardship, and maintaining a social license to operate through transparent stakeholder engagement.

Sustainability

The sustainability framework is built on a commitment to responsible resource extraction, overseen by a dedicated Sustainability Committee. Climate strategy includes supporting the Paris Agreement, developing a Net Zero pathway with targets to be announced in 2025, and installing a 32.4 kWp solar PV array at its processing plant administration building. Environmental stewardship is demonstrated through a closed-loop water management system at the processing plant, a state-of-the-art water treatment lagoon to manage all contact water at the mine, and a commitment to align with the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM). Biodiversity initiatives include a partnership with a local forestry commission for reforestation programs, which has resulted in 10,000 trees being planted. Social engagement is formalized through a Public Liaison Committee and a community information center to maintain dialogue with local stakeholders. Workplace safety performance is a key priority, with a 12-month rolling total recordable incident frequency rate (TRIFR) of 1.05 at year-end 2024.

Structure

The corporate structure includes Adriatic Metals BH d.o.o. as the main operating entity and Adriatic Metals d.o.o. as the sole operating entity for a separate project following an internal reorganization in 2024. This reorganization involved merging 3 wholly owned Serbian entities—Global Mineral Resources d.o.o., Tethyan Resources d.o.o., and TAOR d.o.o.—into Adriatic Metals d.o.o. to simplify the group structure. In 2022, Adriatic Metals Trading and Finance Ltd was incorporated to act as a dedicated trading and finance company for the group. A significant historical structural change was the 2020 acquisition of Adriatic Metals Jersey Limited (formerly Tethyan Resource Corp.) and its subsidiaries. As of March 2025, substantial shareholders with interests over 3% include Helikon Investments (21.44%), L1 Capital (15.52%), T Rowe Price (8.83%), Orion Asset Management (3.73%), and 2 individual investors.

Source

Adriatic Metals - 2024 Annual Report

Vareš Silver
100.00%
🇧🇦 Zenica-Doboj, Bosnia and Herzegovina
operating, underground
Annual production: 7 - 12 moz ag (high)
Resource base: 75 - 150 moz ag (medium)
Average Grade 100 - 200 g/t ag (medium)
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: 4 - 8 Mt Pb (high)
Average Grade 5 - 8 % Pb (high)
Raška
100.00%
🇷🇸 Serbia
exploration
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Annual production: N/A
Resource base: N/A
Average Grade N/A
Last update: 07/04/2025
  1. Project should be interpreted as a single, group or complex of mines, deposits or other mineral assets. Name of the project should be identical to the official company naming convention.
  2. The ranges of values provided are indicative and should not be regarded as exact figures.
  3. Figures for exploration and development projects are based on available data and are indicative only; actual values may vary substantially.
  4. Royalties frequently apply to specific mineralized areas that may not coincide exactly with the boundaries of the overall project. As a result, even if a mine is currently in operation, the portion subject to the royalty may not be included in extraction activities until future years.
  5. Commodities are listed from most dominant to least dominant. Only selected commodities are shown.
  6. Table might not include all projects that are currently owned by the company. Displayed data are snapshots of the company's projects in time and might not be up to date.
  7. Exploration projects are partially represented in the table. Only projects with mineralization or strategic importance are shown.
  8. Companies might own processing facilities that are not included in the table. Those facilities play important role especially for companies operating in uranium, nickel and lithium sectors.
  1. Chart is always based on the company's primary listing.
  1. Presented values are denominated in currency of the country where the company is headquartered. Values like market capitalization might differ from the values visible in other parts of the page, where the currency is always USD.
Commodity Units
  1. koz au: Thousand ounces of gold (production volume)
  2. moz au: Million ounces of gold (resource base or production volume)
  3. g/t: Grams per tonne (grade of gold or silver in ore)
  4. usd/oz au: US dollars per ounce of gold (cost metric)
  5. moz ag: Million ounces of silver (resource base or production volume)
  6. g/t ag: Grams per tonne of silver in ore (grade)
  7. usd/oz ag: US dollars per ounce of silver (cost metric)
  8. kt cu: Thousand tonnes of copper (production volume)
  9. mt ore: Million tonnes of ore (resource base for copper)
  10. %: Percent copper or uranium in ore (grade)
  11. usd/lb cu: US dollars per pound of copper (cost metric)
  12. mlb U3O8: Million pounds of uranium oxide (U3O8) (production or resource base)
  13. % eU3O8: Percent equivalent uranium oxide in ore (grade)
  14. usd/lb u3o8: US dollars per pound of uranium oxide (cost metric)
Mining Methods
  1. Open Pit: Surface mining method using large excavated terraces to extract ore
  2. Underground: Subsurface mining through shafts, tunnels, and chambers
  3. ISR (In-Situ Recovery): Solution mining method using chemical leaching without excavation
Mine Development Stages
  1. Exploration: Early-stage project searching for and defining mineral deposits
  2. Development: Mine under construction or preparation for production
  3. Operating: Active mine currently extracting and processing ore
  4. Expansion: Mine temporarily suspended or with limited production, in progress to increase production in the future
  5. Reclamation: Mine permanently closed or no longer producing, but the site is being rehabilitated
Resource Categories
  1. P&P (Proven and Probable Reserves): Highest confidence mineral resources with detailed mine plans, it's a subset of M&I
  2. M&I (Measured and Indicated Resources): Well-defined resources with good geological confidence
  3. Inf (Inferred Resources): Estimated resources with limited geological confidence
Project Assessment Studies
  1. Scoping Study: High-level assessment to determine if a project warrants further investigation
  2. PEA (Preliminary Economic Assessment): Initial economic evaluation of a mineral project
  3. Pre-Feasibility (Preliminary Feasibility Study): Intermediate-level technical and economic assessment
  4. Feasibility (Definitive Feasibility Study): Comprehensive technical and economic evaluation for investment decisions
  5. BFS (Bankable Feasibility Study): Detailed study meeting lender requirements for project financing
Financial Metrics
  1. NPV (Net Present Value): Discounted value of future cash flows minus initial investment
  2. IRR (Internal Rate of Return): Discount rate that makes NPV equal to zero
  3. Payback Period: Time required to recover initial capital investment from project cash flows
  4. AISC (All-In Sustaining Cost): Total cost per ounce including sustaining capital and corporate costs
Royalty & Streaming
  1. Royalty: Payment to landowner/government based on percentage of production value or revenue
  2. Stream: Agreement to purchase future production at predetermined price, often below market rate
  3. NSR (Net Smelter Return): Royalty based on net revenue after smelting and refining costs
  4. GRR (Gross Revenue Royalty): Royalty based on total gross revenue before any deductions
  5. NPI (Net Profits Interest): Royalty based on net profits after operating costs and capital recovery

©